STORY   LOOP   FURRY   PORN   GAMES
• C •   SERVICES [?] [R] RND   POPULAR
Archived flashes:
229494
/disc/ · /res/     /show/ · /fap/ · /gg/ · /swf/P0001 · P2575 · P5149

<div style="position:absolute;top:-99px;left:-99px;"><img src="http://swfchan.com:57475/89244518?noj=FRM89244518-14DN" width="1" height="1"></div>

This is the wiki page for Flash #214595
Visit the flash's index page for basic data and a list of seen names.


News about the incidnet.swf
5,63 MiB, 01:42 | [W] [I]

Threads (1):

[ZE87E7I]F ! http://boards.4chan.org/f/thread/3366150
ARCHIVEDDiscovered: 2/11 -2018 05:50:55 Ended: 3/11 -2018 05:11:44Flashes: 1 Posts: 17
File: News about the incidnet.swf-(5.62 MB, 320x240, Other)
[_] Anon 3366150 Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anon 3366189 The fuck you yelling at two armed men for? I'd get the fuck out of there not yell like a retarded faggot. Fucken idiot.
>> [_] Anon 3366190 >># If my son wasn't there then might as well. If he was and they didn't give a shit? I'd rather be killed than teach my son to submit to assholes like that.
>> [_] Anon 3366194 >># if youre a dad, the silly lesson about standing your ground you want to teach your son is less important than being there for him as he grows up. think about it. either its "my dad and i had to back down because these guys had guns and it was over some petty shit" or its "my dad threw his life away when i was young over a mattress by a dumpster. i hope i can die a hero like him some day. also i dont have a dad"
>> [_] Anon 3366196 question. if they backed off (which they should have) could they charge the armed hicks with anything? restraining order? revokation of guns?
>> [_] Anon 3366198 >># youre not allowed to threaten people with your guns
>> [_] Anon 3366200 i like how they only showed the parts where the based boyes were making threats and not the basedboy
>> [_] Anon 3366211 >># Oh yeah? I would even sh0ot myself to protest against violent rednecks like this.
>> [_] Anon 3366212 >># brandishing a firearm falls under the definition of assault.
>> [_] Anon 3366215 >># The way that used to be taught before open carry became a political statement, was that typically people don't brandish firearms unless they are prepared to use them. So yes, poor decision.
>> [_] Anon 3366238 >># The 2 rednecks are crazy murders as fuck but the idiot that was yelling was looking for blood
>> [_] Anon 3366273 https://youtu.be/YTKDqxGEKs8
>> [_] Anon 3366274 >quote by woman whose husband was shot
>> [_] Anon 3366276 If someone pulls out a firearm its leave and report it. That guy who was yelling wanted to escalate the situation and his Wife/widow had a camera and both morons decided to get in their face. If you see two guys with guns do not approach do not escalate the situation this is common sense regardless of what you might think of those two hillbilly trigger niggas, report it and swallow your goddamned pride. That woman pissed me off too, she did nothing to help calm the situation or get her husband to back off. >"OH I got a phone let me make the situation worse by >walking up to two psychos and shoving a camera into >their face, woman power!!" BANG BANG >"OH NO my attempt to be a strong brave woman >backfired and now im a widow, better start jerking >myself off about how I couldn't do anything about the >situation." You can tell this guy probably beat her.
>> [_] Anon 3366278 >># Why are you using 3+ layers of quotations?
>> [_] Anon 3366279 >># >assholes like that. They were on (Or very near) their property, holding guns because they knew he was a nut. Reminder that he attacked the mailman and everyone knew how crazy he was. They were in the right with regards to that mattress, and were simply standing their ground.
>> [_] Anon 3366280 >># I doubt it. >># They weren't. >># >The 2 rednecks are crazy murders as fuck It was self-defense. They'll never be convicted of anything.



http://swfchan.net/43/214595.shtml
Created: 2/11 -2018 05:57:38 Last modified: 3/11 -2018 06:38:59 Server time: 14/11 -2024 17:09:34