File: toromi-loop.swf-(5.5 MB, 720x480, Loop)
[_] Anonymous 01/05/21(Tue)16:24:06 No.3455650
spotted an issue with my flash that i posted a few days ago, though you won't even see it if you
don't resize the flash. fixed it in this upload :)
Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anonymous 01/05/21(Tue)16:41:41 No.3455655
>>3455650
Pretty cool. Could also lower filesize by making the desk and black bg a static image that
persists and only make the moving parts (yuuko) seperate images.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/05/21(Tue)16:45:07 No.3455656
>>3455655
oh shit, didn't think of that! i thought it was kinda on the large side too, and i'll definitely
keep that in mind for my next flashes (or i'll update this one when i find the time)
>> [_] Anonymous 01/05/21(Tue)16:45:48 No.3455657
I must have missed the original version, thanks for posting it again. Nice work!
>> [_] Anonymous 01/05/21(Tue)17:40:33 No.3455665
>>3455655
found out that every frame is repeated twice, so i just removed every other frame and halved the
framerate, that dropped the filesize to 3.3MB. i'll probably post that tomorrow since i don't
want to spam the board
>> [_] Anonymous 01/05/21(Tue)17:57:14 No.3455666
When is /f/ getting the new grounds treatment or whatever.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/05/21(Tue)18:32:30 No.3455669
Hey so embeded flashes are just not working anymore, guess Adobe really implemented the
killswitch.
Any tips on how to play flashes on the browser (embeded or otherwise)?
>> [_] Anonymous 01/05/21(Tue)19:20:09 No.3455676
>>3455669
get a browser that doesn't suck and whitelist /f/ in mms.cfg
also not uninstalling flash (happens automatically if silentautoupdate isn't disabled) would help
other than that you can download flashes and open in projector
>> [_] Anonymous 01/05/21(Tue)19:37:33 No.3455680
>>3455676
which are ok?
today ff started randomly blocking flashs despite mmc
>> [_] Anonymous 01/05/21(Tue)20:20:27 No.3455685
Delicious Yuuko suffering.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/05/21(Tue)20:32:09 No.3455687
>>3455680
Maybe it updated itself recently?
Reposting
The issue is actually something 4chan started doing a while back which is setting the x-frame
header option to DENY which prevents any flash file from loading on the 4chan domain. Firefox
used to ignore these header settings but the recent update made it start applying them.
Current workaround is to install an addon called simple-modify-headers and configure it as
follows:
URL Patterns: https://i.4cdn.org/f/*
Action: Delete
Header Field Name: x-frame-options
Header Field Value: null
Apply On: Response
Start it up and flash files should start working again. Be sure to send feedback telling Hiro
that flashes are fucked and maybe they'll fix the issue, if not then we're just stuck with it for
the foreseeable future.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/05/21(Tue)21:43:23 No.3455691
>>3455687
Thanks anon. I managed to find the source of the problem.
I hadnt entered the URL correctly in mms.cfg. (forgot / at end)
Why that didn't become an issue earlier, I don't know. FF hasn't updated yet, so I assume that
will happen in a few days and than I'll be remembering your guide as well. Thx.
I found out about the AllowListRootMovieOnly = 1 option, which should be interesting for flashes
that use a loding page.
SWFs and libraries that are loaded within a flash (think of a game loading screen) will not be
checked for their origin. Running games should become smother.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/05/21(Tue)21:48:38 No.3455693
What an ugly fucking flash.
Why is there a clock?
Why is there a picture below the window?
Why is there so much shit outside the window in general?
>> [_] Anonymous 01/05/21(Tue)21:57:49 No.3455694
>>3455693
why not?
why not?
For info.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/05/21(Tue)22:34:34 No.3455696
>>3455693
It's a fine flash
But there's no beating the Rumia clock, the most powerful of them all
>> [_] Anonymous 01/05/21(Tue)23:13:15 No.3455701
>>3455696
what rumia clock?
>> [_] Anonymous 01/05/21(Tue)23:21:06 No.3455705
Nice dd/mm/yyyy format there pal. Can we get a proper mm/dd/yyyy version instead please? Thanks.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/05/21(Tue)23:30:07 No.3455707
>>3455705
Yeah, I agree, logical date formats are for nerds.
Confusing and unintuitive date formats are for REAL men.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/06/21(Wed)00:01:07 No.3455710
>>3455693
this guy doesn't like clock flashes and this is not his first post about such
>> [_] Anonymous 01/06/21(Wed)00:05:01 No.3455712
>>3455701
rumia_mascot.swf
It's got an alarm function
You get touhou music, she does a little dance, it's a good time
>> [_] Anonymous 01/06/21(Wed)00:59:38 No.3455715
>>3455705
Seconding
>>3455707
d/m/y is the worst one of the main 3. Not only does it not reflect the way most people refer to
dates, but it is the worst from a file organization standpoint. Dessdcending is the best from an
organization standpoint but also shows the typically least important information at the start and
is the furthest from how anyone refers to dates. The format m/d/y retains enough of the
organization benefits to be useable in a filing system while also reflecting how the language is
spoken, it's the most well-rounded format. The only reason to ever propose ascending order is in
order to satisfy some dumb fixation with a linear order. What's worse is that m/d/y from a
numerical standpoint satisfies the above fixation better for more than half of all 365 days. I
could understand arguing for y/m/d, but seriously advocating for d/m/y is the mark of
thoughtlessness. In short, stfu yuropoor.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/06/21(Wed)01:12:04 No.3455718
>>3455715
>most people
mm/dd/yyyy is an anglo thing, most people don't use it, and it has absolutely no organization
benefits, only yyyy/mm/dd has.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/06/21(Wed)01:28:51 No.3455721
>>3455718
It basically has the exact same benefits of y/m/d. If you want to find a certain file, having
m/d/y means the files naturally record according to their dates with in a single year. The only
extra step required compared to y/m/d is to put everything in it's own container or folder at the
end of the year as to not have previous years sit on the same plane. So basically from an
organization standpoint y/m/d only saves you 5 minutes a year electronically and a day a year
with a physical format. Otherwise it's almost the same. Try sifting through a folder timestamped
d/m/y where the date matters and have fun with every single file recorded on the x of each month
being shown adjacent to one another. As far as speech goes, you may be right but in all my years
on the internet which has enough european presence I almost never see people refer to dates as
"The 6th of January". People typically opt for brevity which is where "January 6th" comes in.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/06/21(Wed)01:47:03 No.3455723
>>3455721
>it the exact same benefits of y/m/d except you have to sort on multiple keys
Which means it doesn't have these benefits. If you're gonna have a multiple key-sort then
dd/mm/yyyy is a more logical notation than mm/dd/yyyy.
>As far as speech goes, you may be right but in all my years on the internet which has enough
european presence I almost never see people refer to dates as "The 6th of January". People
typically opt for brevity which is where "January 6th" comes in.
That's because the latter is the correct english notation, but other languages don't work that
way.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/06/21(Wed)04:11:44 No.3455734
>>3455656
the time is right next to her, you must have found it by now
>> [_] Anonymous 01/06/21(Wed)05:36:06 No.3455740
>>3455715
>>3455721
>I almost never see people refer to dates as "The 6th of January"
Most languages are like this though.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/06/21(Wed)07:16:03 No.3455752
>>3455655
Why is it important, everyone has a fast enough internet to load 5 mb
>> [_] Anonymous 01/06/21(Wed)07:18:11 No.3455753
>>3455715
m/d/y if confusing because most europeans say the day before the month, your americans won't
change that even with the internet
