/ > /fap/ > Thread 23504

Age: 252.8d   Health: 0%   Posters: 24   Posts: 80   Replies: 71   Files: 4+2

>> DinDin<3!tr.t4dJfuU 27jul2021(tu)06:01 No. OP P1

Dogars

Dog Arse

 Dogars.swf (1.61 MiB)
1100x750, Compressed (Deflate). 1 frame, 34 fps (00:00).
Ver15, AS3. Network access: No. Text: Yes.
Bitmaps: Yes. Audio: Yes. Video: No. <METADATA>
[find in archive]

>> Anonymous 27jul2021(tu)08:20 No. A P2R1

Is it wrong that i get excited about the new flashes for the secrets rather than the porn? I mean
the porn is good but i really want those secrets.

>> Anonymous 27jul2021(tu)08:36 No. B P3R2

I actually am getting kinda tired of the vanilla stuff imo. I always hope the secrets have more fun
stuff or whatnot, but for me the releases have been incredibly meh/bad as of late.

It's kinda made worse that it's usually just a basic animation of an image with some very minor
secrets (like the sketch of the guy shooting oil cum in this one).

It's just lacking passion, variety and creativity. I know the dicksuckers are going to jump on me
for it, but it's just my opinion anyways.

>> Anonymous 27jul2021(tu)10:12 No. C P4R3

Dog arse?

>> Anonymous 27jul2021(tu)10:46 No. D P5R4

This is magisterial!! She looks spot on.

>>86464
Making comments like these are a sure way to get someone to quit making flashes. The content is
perfectly fine and exactly what the greater majority of all people wants.

All I'd like to comment on is that I don't like the "neck-breaker" angle typical in Japanese porn
where they rotate the scene 40-50 degrees. I know it's a way to "fit more" in a letterbox, it was
fine in a magazine back in the day when you could rotate the paper but when watching on a monitor
you just get a sore neck. ;_; Could maybe implement a generic camera controller? Similar to that
other old flash artist that I forget the name of, he always made it so you could rotate the camera
as well as zoom and move it around.

>> Anonymous 27jul2021(tu)13:24 No. E P6R5

Love your work, Din. Just wish there was a way to receive info from ya on a consistent basis. It
just feels like you're just gonna up and disappear one day.

Love the hidden scenes, btw. Rosa next, or is that just a gift?

>> CuntWaffle 27jul2021(tu)15:12 No. F P7R6

This one is quite dope. I like the Fireball one a little bit more but the quality has definetly
improved since your earlier flashes DinDin, all around good job.

>> Anonymous 27jul2021(tu)16:26 No. G P8R7

>>86464
I didn't realize my stuff was that bad. I'll do better next time, i promise.

>>86471
Seems easy to do. Sort of.

>>86472
I'm not going anywhere. I don't have a Twitter or a blog because I'm not interesting enough to post
everyday. If I do end up leaving then I'll let you know in flash form of course.

Coding is hard. Which is why I'm taking so long on some things. (K-On and Pokegirl) And also why
I'm pumping out these easy to do flashes in the mean time. I hope you guys don't mind it.

>> DinDin<3!tr.t4dJfuU 27jul2021(tu)16:26 No. G P9

>>86464
I didn't realize it was that bad. I'll try to put more effort into the next few things.

>>86471
Seems easy to do. Sort of.

>>86472
I'm not going anywhere. I don't have a Twitter or a blog because I'm not interesting enough to post
everyday. If I do end up leaving then I'll let you know in flash form of course. And nah I just
wanted to draw Rosa and Roxie because I like the designs.

Coding is hard. Which is why I'm taking so long on some things. Especially flashes with lots of
moving parts to them. (K-On and Pokegirl) And also why I'm pumping out these easy to do flashes in
the mean time. I hope you guys don't mind it. Anyways, thanks for the kind words everyone.

This one wasn't a dual release because I was having trouble with the AS3 on the other one. You guys
like Guilty Gear, right?

>> DinDin<3!tr.t4dJfuU 27jul2021(tu)16:27 No. G P10

Sorry, repeat comment. I don't know why swfchan hates me so much.

>> Anonymous 27jul2021(tu)17:20 No. H P11R8

>>86464
You're clearly addicted to porn. Get some help

>> Anonymous 27jul2021(tu)19:06 No. B P12R9

>>86471
Ah yes. Let's worship a loop and act like it's the best thing in the world! Lazy? Nah, it's the
pinnacle of animation! Best not give ACTUAL criticism, that hurts feelings! We have to coddle a
grown man and not actually speak honestly. Reality is a no-no!

>>86476
Obviously I'm not trying to insult you, but your flashes as of late seem to be a bit
interchangeable. I'm having a tough time distinguishing them as they're mostly short loops in
similar positions. I could've sworn even this exact same angle was used once. The easter eggs also
seem to becoming less rewarding while simultaneously becoming more obscure, time wasting and
obnoxious.

That's my opinion on the matter.

>>86478
This was one of the dumbest comments I've ever seen. I unironically don't understand white
knighting artists shitting out loops. Even more ironic is you talk about a "porn addiction" while
you white knight a... porn creator... creating low quality porn.. on a website, wait for it...
dedicated to porn. Who has the addiction again?

That's right troglodyte, I'll give you a hint: it isn't the person actually giving an opinion
without just screeching "THIS IS THE BEST".

>> DinDin<3!tr.t4dJfuU 27jul2021(tu)20:17 No. G P13R10

>>86482
I know you don't mean to come across as rude. I can take the criticism, honest.

But what's time wasting and obnoxious about my eggs? It's just a bonus thing i include because it's
either a concept for another flash i dont finish or just extra shit i doodle up. In this one it was
just going to be the oil cum doodle but i ended up putting in a Rosa animation i was working on the
side cause I figured it would be a better egg to find.

People like to joke about typing in dumb stuff and waiting 3 hours and whatnot but all of them so
far, as far as I can remember anyway, have been a mouseclick event.

And I don't know what you mean by obscure.

>> Anonymous 27jul2021(tu)20:42 No. B P14R11

>>86483
> know you don't mean to come across as rude. I can take the criticism, honest.
Yeah, I didn't mean to come off as rude towards you. Just rude to those subhumans that jump on me
for daring to offer my opinion, even though I wasn't talking to them.

Your easter eggs as of late have boiled down to such obscurities that people have to decompile your
flashes to CHEAT to find your easter eggs. Most seem to not even try and just ask or wait for
someone to decompile your flashes. That alone should be indication enough that there is an issue,
when your fans are having to break down your flashes to find the "Secrets" within it. You're right
though that a majority of the bigger scenes are behind clicking things. The issue is: You have to
spam click everywhere because most if not all of the secret scenes don't have any actual
indications. Some also have such a small window of clicking that it becomes obnoxious when you
thought you clicked on the object but it turns out it only accepts a pixel wide.

It's turned from "Where's Waldo" on the releases to "SPAM THE SHIT OUT OF EVERYTHING EVEN IF IT
LOOKS THE SAME". How is that fun, intuitive or interesting when even most people don't bother with
it until a list is posted usually? I'm just trying to figure out how anyone could find that fun. It
isn't fun, people just want the porn and they're willing to waste their time on something painfully
unfun to get another loop.

I'll give you another example: In mischief makers you have to cum like 5 times or something (you
can correct me on the exact amount) but I remember it being painfully slow to cycle through to get
a short loop of a titfuck animation that once done looped back around to the normal loop. Who in
their right mind is going to watch through 5 of the same cum scenes and why would they get rewarded
for repetition?

I'll give you an example of how ZONE did something that has a similar premise but was much more
intuitive. In his tinkerbell flash, if you left it running for about a minute or something, you get
a surprise anal animation with an anal cum animation. Now tell me, which works better for the
viewing experience.

A surprise small scene after a minute or so - or cycling through the same animation 5 times after
spamming [cum]? It turns a pleasant surprise into a chore.

It's the same with a lot of the easter eggs. I can give more example if you'd like.

>> DinDin<3!tr.t4dJfuU 27jul2021(tu)21:01 No. G P15R12

>>86484
I guess you're right. Okay, I'll keep that in mind for next time.
And yeah the mischief makers one wasn't my favorite either, which is why i try to avoid doing that
again.

>> Anonymous 27jul2021(tu)21:08 No. B P16R13

>>86485
No worries, man. I like your stuff also, I just personally felt disappointed that recent releases
seemed samey and the easter eggs were getting a bit silly in execution.

Hopefully you didn't take any of that the wrong way, as an artist myself I wish people would offer
MORE constructive criticism instead of just praising, which is nice to have mind you, but
ultimately it doesn't help you grow.

One last thing if you don't mind: I've seen people point out the similarities between you and the
late 4chan/f/dude. I see them also, because I worked with him on both of his projects, including
the last one where he disappeared (I also know the circumstances behind that).

The reason I ask is because I have all of art assets from that last project (LOZ:HQ) that he
wanted. I've been sitting on these art assets for years hoping he'd eventually come back, but he
never did. There's quite a few as well. I also wanted to offer a personal apology to him based on
my behavior because of crazy awful shit that was happening to me in real life that caused me to
bail out for a month, which made him take off.

If you're not, no biggie. Hopefully the criticism was helpful.

>> DinDin<3!tr.t4dJfuU 27jul2021(tu)21:29 No. G P17R14

>>86486
It was helpful. Thank you.

And I don't know who 4chan /f/ guy is. I don't post on there as much as I used to because my file
sizes are so big. Sorry I couldn't help you with that.

>> Anonymous 27jul2021(tu)21:31 No. B P18R15

>>86487
Glad it was helpful. Thanks for the reply and listening. I'm looking forward to your future work.

>> Anonymous 28jul2021(we)05:58 No. I P19R16

>>86484
>A surprise small scene after a minute or so - or cycling through the same animation 5 times after
spamming [cum]?
Both of these suck, why is there so much waiting. I like it when once I know the secret I can start
it instantly. The best intereactions are when Dinner designs scenes like a point and click
adventure. Scene's like Green and Misty from SPG2, the order of removing Leaf's clothes or unting
Misty's bikini to progressing the flash differently was great.

>> Anonymous 28jul2021(we)05:58 No. I P20

>A surprise small scene after a minute or so - or cycling through the same animation 5 times after
spamming [cum]? It turns a pleasant surprise into a chore.

Both of those suck, the best I can trigger immediately once I know, don't tell me you enjoyed
waiting to trigger the hidden Midna Zone scene. The longest I can take is 10secs.

Anyway the best scene interactions are when Dinner designs them like a simple point and click game.
The flashes where unting Misty's bikini or the order of stripping Leaf, progressing the scenes
differently were cool. I hope K-ON flash is cool.

>> Anonymous 28jul2021(we)06:10 No. B P21R17

>>86510
I don't disagree with you.

I only pointed that out as an argument though because if there was a scene transition easter egg,
it makes more sense to have a time period in which something dynamic happens opposed to cycling an
existing animation with no variation and forcing you to spam cum. One is passive with a surprise,
the other is literally spamming while seeing and hearing the same cum scene as you keep clicking.

Neither are super ideal, because even in the passive one you have to wait to see that special scene
(in the tinkerbell animation, the anal part was actually the best part too ironically). I only
tried to offer the passive one being less obnoxious if it was purely time gating that dindin wanted
to go with.

Ideally I agree with you, it's much better if it's just a "Visible thing" that is clickable in the
background or on the character. Opposed to a time gating period or spam clicking everywhere because
it's something that looks exactly the same as everything else, but that ONE pixel was the
progression or secret. Progression as you describe is actually something I prefer too, and it opens
up more options for potential secrets if a lot of things are clickable as things progresses.

>> Anonymous 28jul2021(we)06:47 No. I P22R18

>>86511
It's true, I dislike both but I can just leave the passive secret idle in a window. Though I can
argue that's more boring. It's good that we agree on the progression I described. I hate clicking
everywhere, in showcase2 I just decompiled it to list each unique scene. Then mark the triggers on
an image, so people didn't have to hunt for an hour like I did. I was gonna label what was in each
scene but I wanted to keep some surprise.

>> Anonymous 28jul2021(we)06:50 No. B P23R19

>>86514
I'm in complete agreement. I'm glad this has been productive in general and hopefully this helps
make better quality works that everyone knows DinDin can make.

>> Anonymous 28jul2021(we)08:28 No. J P24R20

As long as we’re critiquing our free porn, it would be nice if the Easter eggs weren’t so finicky.
I don’t mind the being super hidden, but maybe if there was less waiting involved with them?

>> Anonymous 28jul2021(we)14:43 No. C P25R21

>>86514
man I dont know the last thing about decompiling flash but I'm trying lol. How did you do what you
did?

>> Anonymous 28jul2021(we)16:55 No. I P26R22

>>86520
I just open the downloaded flash in "JPEXS Free Flash Decompiler". Then search the shapes, sprites,
images, frames tabs. I don't know how to use it to find invisible buttons yet though.

[IMG]1.jpg

>> Anonymous 28jul2021(we)19:21 No. K P27R23

click Lower left 1secret

>> Anonymous 29jul2021(th)04:03 No. C P28R24

>>86521
Ah the invisible buttons is what I'm trying to figure out how to do too. Thanks for the reply tho

>> Anonymous 29jul2021(th)04:17 No. C P29

there's an easter egg in the pokeball button too

>> CuntWaffle 29jul2021(th)14:33 No. F P30R25

>>86523
Oh yeah thats legit. Probably the best girl from gen 5, nice.

>> Doga RS 30jul2021(fr)18:53 No. L P31R26

>>86464
I can somewhat understand the fatigue of vanilla, but for what it is, it's really good. This is top
vanilla for sure.
Always love me some simple pokegirl getting creamed.
Sure, some of Dinner's work has been more elaborate, but he's releasing at a stable pace in turn.

>>86533
>>86523
Woo, best girl incoming. Tbo, I was kinda disappointed about the small scene Mai got in the
Pokegirls compilation (though nice camio in the lolicatgirls section).
But I take the blame for it myself. I was the one who suggested her, but didn't provide any
context. Seems like Dinner is fond of the designs, but doesn't know too much about the common porn
settings.
Let me just elaborate: Mai is all about that pantyhose. Just look at her "throws pokeball in game"
animation, she got some sweet ass in a coomtasty outfit.

>>86476
>Guilty Gear
Heck yeeeeah.

Also any chance you gonna return to that SMT flash, DinDin? Just had to think about it lately.

>> Anonymous 30jul2021(fr)18:55 No. L P32

Also, don't know if it's intentional, but her facial expression doesn't stay changed between loops,
while her top does.

>> Anonymous 30jul2021(fr)21:50 No. M P33R27

>>86556
If I remember correctly, his last showcase had a Demeter scene, so either he is working on more
content for that flash or is something entirely new with SMT gals.

Either outcomes, I will be glad because I love that smug loli.

>> DinDin<3!tr.t4dJfuU 31jul2021(sa)07:41 No. OP P34R28

https://ibb.co/k8WXk91
Yeah. I never stopped working on this. Just had other stuff I wanted to do first.

>> Anonymous 31jul2021(sa)09:12 No. N P35R29

>>86464
I agree that the flash is kind of boring. Not in the sense of "No more vanilla stuff, I want
flashes where the girl is pooping on someone's feet in a mime costume", but in the sense that there
isn't really a joke or scenario anywhere.

I think the reason the original Smash-a-Pokegirl flashes worked so well is because they felt like
little in-universe stories that also happened to tell a joke or include humor. A lot of your other
better flashes do that as well. This flash has the weird distinction of being technically competent
and drawn very well but is lacking in your usual personality. A part of me feels like that's
because you want to deliver flashes more regularly, even if they are bite-sized.

>> DinDin<3!tr.t4dJfuU 31jul2021(sa)09:58 No. OP P36R30

>>86563
I get that. I don't have a joke for this I just wanted to draw Roxie. But if you guys dont want
stuff like this anymore then that's totally ok.

>> Anonymous 31jul2021(sa)10:51 No. B P37R31

>>86563
>>86564
I agree but it doesn't have to be humor related, really any sense of story or direction really
makes a huge difference. Like the anon described as an "in-universe story".

I think that it makes that much of a difference with easter eggs as well, with things that are in
universe offering something unique when found opposed to a WIP or whatnot. Because WIP's are
already shown in your WIP showcases.

A good example is that indivisible easter egg feeling more in-universe by offering a different
transformation for the MC which had a futa scene (Going off of memory here but I'm pretty sure
that's how it went) . So you have something working within the parameters of the universe (with
said universes characters) for a unique scenario opposed to just random sex with a random
silhouette.

I think that's where your flashes shine most.

>> Anonymous 31jul2021(sa)12:30 No. O P38R32

>>86523
where exactly did you click? screenshot?

>> Hangman 31jul2021(sa)13:11 No. P P39R33

Ey, Dindin, if you ever need music, hit me up.

>> DinDin<3!tr.t4dJfuU 31jul2021(sa)20:01 No. G P40R34

>>86565
Yeah I get that. I'll try to be more clever about it in the future now but I didn't want to make
this one funny or anything I just wanted to draw a real fast and easy Roxie and decided to add a
Rosa animation I did on the side. I wasn't trying to give it a story or be fancy.

>> Anonymous 31jul2021(sa)22:19 No. Q P41R35

Ignore the haters, this one's lovely. More than one spurt/a slightly longer climax would make it
perfect, but it's great as is!

Now do one with Elesa and her gym music. God damn.

>> Anonymous 31jul2021(sa)22:24 No. Q P42

>>86570
That and more quiet little moaning sounds while she's riding. Oops.

>> DinDin<3!tr.t4dJfuU 1aug2021(su)00:21 No. OP P43R36

>>86570
Sounds like fun. I don't think they're haters though. I appreciate everyone's input all the same.
>>86568
Sure. Do you know how to loop tracks seamlessly? It's a big pain to do.

>> Anonymous 1aug2021(su)03:56 No. M P44R37

>>86564
Oh no, I'm pretty sure we all love it. It's simple, sure, but small stuff like that is always a
pleasure to see.

>>86562
In the words of our lord and savior Freezer: "Glorious".

>> Anonymous 1aug2021(su)16:49 No. L P45R38

>>86484
Funnily enough I find this just as if not even more obnoxious. Really a bad example for a good
easteregg, but idk any as well (>>86509). The pokeball is fine enough in this one. Also in the
previews as well, because that's kinda the whole point of them.
But just maybe adding a simple 2 frame animation on mouseover can go a long way I think.

>>86511
Don't get your argument really. The amount of clicking doesn't impact what you hear or not. Having
it run idly in the background just makes me switch tabs and then missing it happening.

>>86471
I don't really see the problem. It's supposed to be viewed from that angle. You don't have to watch
the person getting fucked straight up 100%. Though I'd be lying if I say there haven't been flashes
where I did rotate in the past when possible. Though those were more simple flash tweens. I think
with frame drawn animation it might look stupid to rotate, but then again, it really doesn't hurt
to give the option.

>>86486
>I also know the circumstances behind that
Dude, you can't just say that and then not follow in on it. It's not like you have to spell out
names or anything. I'd sure love to know myself. /f/ dude was a (short lived) legend!

>>86563
For me the details make it worth it. The facial expression and the pussy freckles. Also the
bouncing of the boobs looks really appealing.
I'm not saying I wouldn't want more extreme stuff for a change too, but just that the flash is
cumworthy and that's really all that counts in my book. Haven't been able to cum to 99% of
mainstream vanilla stuff regularely. That just goes to show that the art style can make or break
simple stuff.

Glad to see Dinner got the cum animations figured out slowely.
It wasn't that long ago that he didn't even dare to try to animate them, so respect for that
progress my dude.

>>86572
Apart from just cutting it in Audacity? That's what I do normally. Just needs a keen eye for waves
and beat and a good ear. If there's a better way than trial and error, I'd love to know.
The easy part with videogame music is, that because it was already meant to be looped, you just
have to cut a perfect part. That means the cut ends on the frame before the begging part starts.
The wave should look exactly the same as if you didn't cut it.

>> Anonymous 1aug2021(su)16:53 No. L P46

Can't lie though, that easteregg with her getting groped by her hair. Would freaking love to have
seen that animated. That's probably more among the "style" of your flashes, using distinctive parts
from the visual design in fitting porn ways.

Also, I guess what anon B says holds true, that I don't have a good way of discovering eggs. I do
rely on people to find them, so maybe they just decompile it. I don't think that's a bad conduct,
but yeah, ... has anyone found >>86521 yet?

>> Anonymous 1aug2021(su)20:36 No. C P47R39

My only criticism of these flashes is that it's so difficult to find some of the easter eggs.
Otherwise, they're generally some of the best content coming out lately.

>> Anonymous 2aug2021(mo)00:04 No. R P48R40

>>86576
Click on the eye of the Koffing in the background for the Rosa anal scene

>> Anonymous 2aug2021(mo)01:30 No. B P49R41

>>86575
>Funnily enough I find this just as if not even more obnoxious.
Quantify that. When you're offering something that is in opposition for an argument you normally
quantify WHY you feel that way. Not just that you feel things, notice how in everything I say I
quantify it with an example or a reasoning?

>Don't get your argument really. The amount of clicking doesn't impact what you hear or not. Having
it run idly in the background just makes me switch tabs and then missing it happening.

The amount of clicking DOES impact what you hear and I offered an example with mischief makers in
which that DID happen (Even Dindin agreed, so what?), with voice clips looped consistently through
clicking to advance the scene. Saying "Nuh uh", isn't a counter argument, plus I don't feel
strongly about defending a position in which I stated it was a "lesser evil, but ultimately still
evil" (paraphrasing obviously but that's the crux of what was stated). Unless you're referring to
clicking "IN GENERAL" on things that cannot be seen (or even if they are, they're a pixel wide)
which was a separate argument that had nothing to do with "hearing" anything.

You're really hung up on me pointing out that it's less obnoxious due to the comparison offered as
an alternative, yet I actually offered the proper solution that me and Anon I discussed that we
both PREFER. I also only offered that as an alternative because it's based on what Dindin wants to
design, and if timegating is his preference, then I offered something that I personally think is
much less obnoxious (quantified it with why, and offered an example). Though, oddly enough my
ACTUAL preference and my agreement with Anon I escaped any form of reply when I already addressed
this to anon I in one of the replies you quote. In case you missed it, it's the VISIBLE clickable
things that don't need you to spam click everything. Or advance the SAME scene over and over and
hear and see the same thing over and over.

>>86576
>Also, I guess what anon B says holds true, that I don't have a good way of discovering eggs. I do
rely on people to find them, so maybe they just decompile it. I don't think that's a bad conduct,
but yeah

So you admit you have to have someone else, who relies on a third party program to actually find
easter eggs? This proves my point. Because if it was intuitive, you wouldn't have to do such a
thing. Also this in general reeks of you not knowing really anything about dindin's flashes. From
the beginning of his pokegirl flashes, people openly talked about de-compiling to find the secrets,
and also his last WIP flash had an easter egg FOR decompilers because dindin is aware that there's
people decompiling to find the easter eggs. On top of that there were about 3-4 people who didn't
even BOTHER with finding anything in the last thread, and just talked/showed pictures of where they
were to be discovered. They openly discussed this (there's people openly discussing that same thing
here too, even Anon I did).

All it sounds to me is that you don't want to actually be constructive, there's this weird cult
like mentality with people in which any form of constructive feedback to actually make something
better is viewed as negatively (because they're idiots). You notice how you can take what my
criticisms are and find value in them? Yet if you look at your post its just "WELL I FEEL" and
"WELL THIS IS MAYBE HAPPENING BUT THERE'S NO ISSUE". Dindin can improve and if anyone actually
wants to see him improve they have to offer FEEDBACK, not suck his fucking cock even when he
doesn't do something good. You even ACKNOWLEDGE my argument and say "NAH IT'S OKAY", even if you
have to rely on SOMEONE ELSE, who uses a THIRD PARTY PROGRAM, which PROVES it wasn't designed well
(otherwise you wouldn't need a third party program...)

Does that mean I'm saying bad things about Dindin? No, of course not. I think Dindin is actually
from what I've seen a really nice guy, on top of that he can take criticism and he's improving all
the time. As an artist I can see that, and be impressed, but constructive criticism is for HELPING
people, not HURTING them, and it's such an easy thing to understand and yet there is no value being
offered from people who just go BEST THING EVER. A trained monkey could take someone's place for
that, and nobody would notice unironically. If you disagree that's fine, but don't say shit like
"OH THIS IS A PROBLEM, BUT YEAH IT'S NOT", it's contradictory and exposes the mentality that
criticism is bad.

>> Anonymous 2aug2021(mo)03:57 No. S P50R42

>>86582
Tl;dr

Plz no more gatekeeping thx.

>> Anonymous 2aug2021(mo)04:06 No. B P51R43

>>86583
I mean, kinda. I think that's a bit oversimplified, and there's a lot of issues within the
specificity of what I'm describing. But that's fair enough as a TL;DR.

>> Anonymous 2aug2021(mo)07:51 No. A P52R44

Jesus i was just trying to make a joke with my first post, what the fuck happened here?

>> Anonymous 2aug2021(mo)09:06 No. B P53R45

>>86585
People having a conversation? I figured that was pretty obvious. Not to be snarky, but I don't
think anyone cared about your joke or post (otherwise they would've replied).

My opinion which prompted the initial conversation was simply from how I felt. Then Dindin asked me
to offer criticism/elaboration upon my opinion here >>86483 . About 80% of it has been civil (a few
dumb anon's replied). That's more or less the QRD. Hope that illuminates things for ya, even though
you could've just read.

>> Anonymous 3aug2021(tu)00:42 No. T P54R46

Yeet, the skeet, beat the meat. Glad to see love of the cutie here.

I do sorta wish her face stuck in the smug face to have a slightly different cum cycle, but holy
hell is this one very nice reason to have worked to get flash working again. Thankye

>> Anonymous 3aug2021(tu)13:45 No. P P55R47

>>86572
I've worked on other games before, it's a pain in the ass I've learned to work with.

>> Anonymous 5aug2021(th)13:48 No. K P56R48

>>86572
I like your style. not the other people style.

just do yourself is good for me.

>> Anonymous 9aug2021(mo)01:26 No. U P57R49

Flash Request

Hey Dinner, love your work, your style, and your effort. It's nice to have flash creators still
active after the purge.

I have a very specific, very special request. I have no idea if it's something you'd be willing to
do, but this feels like my best shot.

I'm a huge fan of the "is no more" series of swf's. I'm sure you've seen them on /f/ (billy mays is
no more.swf, etc.). Well, Trevor Moore, my all time favorite comedian from WKUK just passed
abruptly and unexpectedly. I'm pretty broken up about it. I'd really love an "is no more" swf with
Trevor's picture.

You're one of the few people I know still making flash content, would it be possible for you to
make that swf? I know it's not your usually thing, but I'd really love to have that in my
collection.

[IMG]Trevor_Moore.jpg

>> Anonymous 9aug2021(mo)01:42 No. D P58R50

>>86652
>Moore died after being involved in an accident on August 6, 2021. No details about the accident
have been published. Moore was 41.
First the Berserk at age 54 creator and now this. Everybody always assumes they will live to 85 but
there may just be a few short years left.
This is a huge off-topic request and discussion tho, I don't even know if there's a
machine-code-is-no-more template out there. You should have made a /disc/ thread instead.

>> Anonymous 9aug2021(mo)02:07 No. U P59R51

>>86654
Thanks for the suggestion. I've created the post. Really hoping it'll get some traction.

>> Anonymous 11aug2021(we)22:45 No. L P60R52

>>86580
Thanks, don't know how I could miss that.
Also, it's more like the eye of the koffing for anyone interested. The whole background sprite is
rather large.

>> Anonymous 12aug2021(th)18:03 No. L P61

>>86652
Seems like you got your wish granted. It was a well deserved flash indeed.

>>86582
Nigger, I just gave my 2cents, I'm not trying to write my master thesis on this shit.
I don't even know what you're getting at anymore...
I just stated my opinion for no real reason other than having one, and despite not arguing it like
you did, it's just as much my opinion like yours is yours. I can feel shit and act upon it as much
as I want. I feel the feel when cumming and not counting the seconds it takes me to fap and
quantifying that as some argument, I just say "it felt good mang, the chinese cartoon pornography
hit the spot".
I'm not even trying to debunk all your arguments completely. Parts of it were surely in congruence
with what I'd argue.
Just that your opinion isn't the only one here.

I don't like "repeat X loops of the animation" eastereggs, because even if I knew how to access
them, it would take a fixed amount of time. And when I try to switch it to the background and do
something else while waiting, I most often miss it, because there is no clear indication of the egg
happening. You'd have to sit in front of it and wait for it to not miss it.
I'd rather some cryptic button presses, because yeah, I don't know how to find them (rather that
I'm stupid for missing obvious clicks sometimes, and yes, I COULD decompress the file myself and
find them, I'd do it if nobody else would) BUT I don't care as I don't have to. Some kind anon
always points them out in the threads and I find it to be an intriguing group hunt everytime. As
long as you know them you can access them asap. I don't think 100% are only found by cheating, most
are probably actually discovered. I wouldn't want disassembling the file to be the first move that
anyone does. A short while of genuine hunting should most likely be a thing.

Like yeah, some kind of visualisation would be great. And maybe even a mix of these too. Sky's the
limit.

Then you just go on about how passive waiting would be better than actively pressing buttons? I
still cannot see your argument here. Having button presses sure makes it more tedious, but most
likely you have to sit in front of it anyway. And having a button press makes you not miss it
unintentionally. As the scene wouldn't advance without you clicking.

Also, I was neither defending our boy DinDin here from LE BAD CRITIQUE MAN, because I don't have to
do such a thing and I understood from the start that you're maybe all kinds of weird, but not
trying to insult anyone here.
Nor was I gatekeeping or trying to push my one and only opinion on the OP.
Can't really understand where any of this is coming from, but whatever rocks your socks I suppose.

>> Anonymous 12aug2021(th)20:03 No. B P62R53

>>86694
"Nuh uh" and "ad hominem" the post. Not gonna bother if you're not able to hold a coherent thought.
It's just gonna shit up the thread so I'll stop replying to your nonsense.

>> Anonymous 12aug2021(th)21:39 No. L P63R54

>>86695
Jeez man, aren't you just a swell guy, fighting the good fight on the internet and not replying to
people when it fits your schizo bullshit.

>> Anonymous 12aug2021(th)22:17 No. B P64R55

>>86696
Okay faggot, if you want me to put you in your place so badly. I will.

>>86694

>Nigger, I just gave my 2cents, I'm not trying to write my master thesis on this shit.
Yes, you can hardly comprehend anything at all (let alone writing), and it's embarrassing. I'll
elaborate.

First part of your post is just "OH I GOT AN OPINION I WASN'T TRYING TO DEBUNK EVERYTHING". Cool,
did I say you were trying to debunk "everything"? No, I said try to elaborate upon what you mean
when you argue, so people (and myself) can understand where you're coming from. A very simple and
logical request. But you're too stupid for even basic conversation or reading comprehension
apparently.

>I just stated my opinion for no real reason other than having one, and despite not arguing it like
you did, it's just as much my opinion like yours is yours. I can feel shit and act upon it as much
as I want. Just that your opinion isn't the only one here.

I never stated you shouldn't express your opinion. I also never even IMPLIED my opinion was MORE
important. Only that if you want to express your dissenting opinion, try to actually explain
yourself. I never stated you "Can't feel shit". Basically everything you make out of this claim has
nothing to do with what I was talking about. I know, I know, you can't read. It's tough to do that,
maybe if you knew how, I wouldn't have to point out something so basic.

>I'd rather some cryptic button presses, because yeah, I don't know how to find them (rather that
I'm stupid for missing obvious clicks sometimes, and yes, I COULD decompress the file myself and
find them, I'd do it if nobody else would) BUT I don't care as I don't have to.

Holy fuck you have down syndrome. You want cryptic button presses for no obvious reason other than
just because you want them. You again state you can't find them, SHOWING it's not good design, then
you previously said you rely on other people. Holy shit you're so stupid it's actually fucking
hurting me

>I don't think 100% are only found by cheating, most are probably actually discovered.
Bro, bro when you make statements, try thinking. Try just a little bit. I already stated Dindin
literally included an easter egg because so many people decompile. I also pointed out in EVERY
THREAD people SAY and SHOW they decompile, AND in the fucking WIP thread you can literally look.
You aren't providing an opinion, you aren't providing a rebuttal, I already unironically
objectively proved this to be true. Holy fuck how do people like you function in day to day life?

Then you go on to say:
>I CAN'T UNDERSTAND YOUR OPINION OR READ
Cool man, awesome, it's almost like people have different tastes and I explained mine and argued
for it. Crazy right?

>Also, I was neither defending our boy DinDin here from LE BAD CRITIQUE MAN, because I don't have
to do such a thing
Okay, let's look at your post that i pointed you out doing this, dipshit.

>Also, I guess what anon B says holds true, that I don't have a good way of discovering eggs. I do
rely on people to find them, so maybe they just decompile it. I don't think that's a bad conduct

So here you literally say I'm right, bit fucking ironic but let's continue onto the meat of this.
"I do rely on people to find them, so maybe they just decompile it. I don't think that's a bad
conduct"

So I argue in favor of it being an issue, you say "I don't think that's bad conduct" which is a
disagreement to my argument. Now let's look at the literal word "defending" because you can't read,
you can't write, you can't understand, let's have a little peeksie.

defend verb
to maintain or support in the face of argument or hostile criticism
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/defend

So you supported dindin's decision in the face of my argument. You literally don't even understand
basic fucking words. People like you infuriate me because you literally do not live in reality and
have no capability of introspection. You don't go "oh shit i'm wrong, even the dictionary proves me
wrong on a basic word", slimy intellectual dishonest filth such as your self will squirm until you
try to feel validated by your position which is not seated in reality.

I'm not done pointing out how absolutely stupid you are though. Let's continue-

>I understood from the start that you're maybe all kinds of weird, but not trying to insult anyone
here.

Hilarious, you prove yourself wrong in the response here to me >>86696

But I'm not done. It's amusing that you find me weird, we're on a porn forum and you can't just
admit you were wrong. EVERYONE here is weird, dindin literally creates rape fantasies via
animations for loli. If I go on rants or try to have discussions does that make me weird? Sure, but
what does that make you when you do the same thing? A hypocrite is what it makes you. The lack of
fucking self awareness is disgusting.

>Can't really understand where any of this is coming from
Because you unironically can't think. Even when you're proven wrong by objective facts you just go
into cognitive dissonance land. You lack introspection, humility, self awareness and a fucking
brain.

Do you see why I considered this a waste of time now? Because you unironically CAN'T learn from
this, you're unable to. Top it all off with "SCHIZO BULLSHIT" buzzword and you're not only
retarded, you don't even understand the irony of your own posts. Which you will now go "NUH UH"
again ad infinitum. You're unironically too stupid to converse with.

I know this stupid faggot will continue shitposting but I offer my apologies to dindin. I'm sorry I
made a huge post, I was just responding because he wanted me to.

>> Anonymous 12aug2021(th)22:45 No. L P65R56

Ok boomer.

>>86698
Well, looks like you're not any more willing to read my post as intended yourself and just
interpret basically whatever you want into it, so I'm satisfied. For a hot second I was actually
thinking you may have a point to your rambling.

>> Anonymous 12aug2021(th)22:53 No. B P66R57

Lemme offer my apologies again to dindin and everyone else in the thread (Besides the troglodyte
Anon L, who immediately after my post literally proved me right in everything I said ironically
enough).

I didn't mean to make a huge post, I know that ruins the quality of the thread, that's not my
intention. I have a love for conversation, wherever it may be. Unfortunately when dumb people say
dumb shit at me and demand I respond, I have a tendency to respond (The bigger the post i'm
responding to, the bigger the response.).

That being said I'll leave it off on a positive note:

I think that your work as an artist: to give so many animated works to random people on the
internet and share your silly porn, is a kind thing to do. I can see really steady improvement, and
you even accept requests from random people and do work for free. Hell even when people are being
assholes outright, you're still a nice guy.

So I'll just personally say thanks. Very few artists and people are as kind as you, even people
like ZONE went on to paywall all of his stuff. Kudos and the best of luck to you in your future
endeavors.

>> Anonymous 12aug2021(th)23:18 No. S P67R58

>>86700
ok

>> Anonymous 12aug2021(th)23:25 No. B P68R59

>>86701
Kek. Dunno why, but this cracked me up.

>> Anonymous 13aug2021(fr)10:30 No. L P69R60

>>86700
You seem to be under the terrible misconception that writing many words equals a profound statement.

Dude, chill out finally, Mr. arrogant. Nobody cares if you write a 10 paragpraph response
everytime. Dinner is just happy to see his flashes well received, everything else is irrelevant.
The thread was basically dead already anyway.

>> Anonymous 13aug2021(fr)12:13 No. B P70R61

>>86706
Why are you continuously trying to start shit? Fuck off, you little retard.

>> Anonymous 13aug2021(fr)12:37 No. V P71R62

I just got done reading all of Anon L's replies and Anon B's replies to him. Anon B's arguments
made sense, Anon L just can't read lul. I wouldn't have wasted my time here trying to tell him
again in your first reply >>86582 . It was pretty obvious he was dumb when dindin, and >>86514
completely understood and he just keeps spamming "I don't understand". I mean if Dindin thanked you
Anon B, you don't gotta defend your position, he already got the ideas you presented. >>86487

I'm pretty sure Anon L is trolling. If he's not trolling he's brain damaged. I mean look at this >>8
6699 "Ok boomer", you may as well shout "PICKLE RICK".

>>86706
He clearly didn't say any of those things. I'm pretty sure he's doing it out of respect because
nobody likes shitposts or shitposters (like yourself). I have no idea why you're trying to trash
Dindin's thread more, while speaking for Dindin and saying it doesn't matter. It does matter. I
agree with Anon B, go away.

>> LOL HOW DO I DONE REED? 13aug2021(fr)12:54 No. L P72R63

>>86715
>>86712
Seeing how the only thing I can answer is NU-UH anyway in your head, Imma gonna do just that.
So how about you stop whining about being tired of vanilla porn and go suck on a phat one instead,
you double nigger? You can grow a dick tree for all I care.

Also, nice IP hopping there, breh. Real mature.
If you really respected the thread or OP as much as you say you do, you would have stopped posting
a long time ago.

>> Anonymous 13aug2021(fr)12:59 No. V P73R64

>>86716
lul sorry to disappoint, I'm just another dude reading the thread. Stop shitposting, seriously.

>> Anonymous 13aug2021(fr)13:12 No. L P74R65

>>86718
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

>> Anonymous 13aug2021(fr)13:12 No. B P75R66

>>86715
>You don't have to defend your position
I was just unironically trying to answer his question. Then he resorted to inflammatory remarks,
intellectually dishonesty and buzzwords, all because he couldn't get understand basic concepts.

For anyone else: if I didn't explain it well to avoid this dumb shit -

I presented two arguments earlier.

I talked to Dindin about having an issue with timegating. Which lead to-

1. Time Gating as an easter egg.

Mischief makers was the example used. In mischief makers you had to click the screen to advance to
the cum screen, all the while you have to listen to the repeated audio spam while doing so. You had
to cycle out 6-7 cum screens to get a new scene ONCE, then it looped normally.
This is already time gating it's just requiring you to proactively spam the screen.

I said that if time gating was going to be the method behind an easter egg, spamming the scene is
more obnoxious than just waiting a period of time. Because in Mischief makers it takes you around a
minute to get to the bonus scene once, while a passive waiting screen could take less time.

Is any of this ideal for an easter egg? Nah, but that was never the discussion. It wasn't about "Is
time gating good", it was "If time gating is used, what's the least obnoxious way to go about it".

2. Hidden Easter Eggs.

There's no real rhyme or reason for the easter eggs, nor their locations. They've become so
abstract and hidden that you have to click pixels that even if you know the location, you can still
get wrong due to the activation being so narrow.

It's turned from "Where's Waldo" to "SPAM EVERYTHING ON THE SCREEN AND PRAY". This has made mostly
everyone either resort to de-compiling the flash or relying on those who do (you can see this every
thread when people ask for secrets or show they're decompiling or even dindin who included a
decompiler secret.

3. What is the best method?

I only offered my preferred method, which was: Something that can be hidden or out in the open but
visually identifiable as a secret, to give it back the "where's waldo" and make you earn the easter
egg. So people can actually not have to rely on decompilers. I'm sure other people could offer new
and better ones.

>>86716
Holy fuck you're mentally ill. I didn't stop posting because people keep replying to me, and when
people stopped replying to me, I stopped posting. You can see me not posting for 10 days until you
tried to shitpost and I was dumb enough to reply to you. I also provided help and just simply
talked to other people, you've done nothing but be a spamming idiot. Now apparently everyone who
disagrees with you is me? Get help.

>> Anonymous 13aug2021(fr)13:27 No. W P76R67

We need a report function breh, adminkun needs to clean up Anon L's garbage from this thread. He's
gotta be breaking some rule.

>> Anonymous 13aug2021(fr)13:42 No. L P77R68

>>86721
Firstly, there is such a function. Read the goddamn Overview. Not that it's necessary most of the
time. Admin always lurks in the threads, he's a good guy.
And secondly, sorry no, having an opinion that you don't like is not a bannable offense.
I mean, I ain't even trying anything here. I just post a single emoji in response to blatant IP
hopping and the guy goes on to write another 500 words answer. It's not even funny anymore.

>> Anonymous 13aug2021(fr)13:47 No. W P78R69

>>86722
>it's not blatant shitposting it's my opinion
>everyone's a samefag
>keep inciting flaming and off topic garbage
>low quality garbage replies
k, time to report

>> Anonymous 13aug2021(fr)14:02 No. L P79R70

Also, sorry for the late bump, but I just noticed Dinner never attached his linked image - so with
the intent of preservation this is the SMT preview >>86562 which I am very much excited for :3

[IMG]cathedral-of-shadows-1.jpg

>> Anonymous 13aug2021(fr)14:09 No. W P80R71

>>86724
i've never seen someone 180 so quickly after so much shitposting, you even know your doing bad shit
and its obvious.

the new smt is gonna be fire though. maybe that twink mc will get into the next smt flash by dindin.