File[zm[11]64kbps.swf] - (3.14 MB)
[_] [?] Anonymous 08/16/10(Mon)20:47 No.

Marked for deletion (old).

>> [_] Anonymous 08/16/10(Mon)21:01 No.

  Much of this is basic socialism, really... the problem is we know that this doesn't work in a
  human society very well. And not because of some bible belt retardation of 'socialism is evil.'
  This completely removes how the human mind works and how the human mind grows. The parts that are
  worth paying attention to most of course are the longevity and recycling aspects, but trying to
  get things down to a small level of the population with dictatoral control over resource
  management stifles growth and possibility.

  Human life is designed to always be moving forward. If humans weren't in a situation where they
  could work, we would stagnate and die as a species. On a long enough timeline, anarchy would
  actually arise because we WEREN'T working. The idea of living means seeking what you love and
  enjoy so that your life is fulfilling. This can never be done for you, people can only help set
  you on a path.

  Interesting scientific method breakdown nonetheless.

>> [_] Anonymous 08/17/10(Tue)00:27 No.

  >>1347316

  They almost sort of touched at the core problem. It's the money system, and to a certain extent,
  ownership. When people spend their entire lives paying off a mortgage or when a single person
  "owns" several factories and all of the equipment therein, there's something very wrong with the
  way people think. They also touched on that note; what makes me hate this society on a daily
  basis more than anything is the consumerist mindset in the average person that fuels the entire
  beast.

  But from a mechanical standpoint, when the shit hits the fan I promise you it will be because of
  usury and over-consolidation of resources.