File[delusion.swf] - (2.38 MB)
[_] [?] atheists are deluded Anonymous 07/20/10(Tue)08:34 No.1323323
Atheists are deluded.
Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anonymous 07/20/10(Tue)08:42 No.1323328
Scientists just face palmed. Stupid Christians. And Jews. And Muslims. And Hindu. And other stuff.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/20/10(Tue)08:55 No.1323336
this was a joke you faggots find it on youtube
>> [_] Esileruf !!6ypvhHveIRt 07/20/10(Tue)08:57 No.1323337
>Just a Joke
>found on youtube
>posted here to make OP troll the newfags.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/20/10(Tue)08:57 No.1323338
>implying all scientists are atheists
>> [_] Anonymous 07/20/10(Tue)09:00 No.1323341
>>1323338
>implying most aren't
>> [_] Anonymous 07/20/10(Tue)09:02 No.1323343
>>1323338
>implying even scientist can't be morons.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/20/10(Tue)09:11 No.1323354
>>1323337
>>>>implying that this is OC
>> [_] Anonymous 07/20/10(Tue)09:13 No.1323357
This flash has one key weakness: religious people don't understand satire.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/20/10(Tue)09:36 No.1323366
lolitrollu
Also, "If your file is to be tagged as "[?] Other", re-examine the first rule before submission."
>> [_] Anonymous 07/20/10(Tue)10:17 No.1323388
>>1323366
>>1323357
coincidence? i think not.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/20/10(Tue)10:19 No.1323389
>>1323388
I'm an atheist, the flash is just shitty
Checkmate
>> [_] Anonymous 07/20/10(Tue)10:19 No.1323390
Trololololololo-- hahaha hohoho heheheh hahaha, lololololololololol~
>> [_] Anonymous 07/20/10(Tue)10:26 No.1323393
>>1323389
> i'm an atheist, so behaving like a little shit is perfectly fine
>> [_] Anonymous 07/20/10(Tue)10:29 No.1323394
>>1323357
True, dumbasses never heard about sarcasm, they actually believe this is for real.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/20/10(Tue)10:41 No.1323401
>>1323389
Then what's your point?
>> [_] Anonymous 07/20/10(Tue)10:44 No.1323403
The only people that should be offended is Christians. because they get offended at everything.
even if its funny.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/20/10(Tue)10:48 No.1323404
WHBT
>> [_] Anonymous 07/20/10(Tue)11:01 No.1323416
>God wrote the bible
No Paul did stupid fuck... How is it that I never go to church yet I understand more about
Christianity than most Christians do
>> [_] Anonymous 07/20/10(Tue)11:12 No.1323422
Unless God shows up on earth.. or the anti-christ scorches the the surface or the earth.. I won't
ever believe on god.
Hell, I believe more in the Norse mythology.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/20/10(Tue)11:17 No.1323427
Circular logic is not proof. In fact it weighs more heavily in favor of a counter argument.
Saying that God wrote the bible, and the bible proves there is a God is not proof.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/20/10(Tue)11:18 No.1323428
>>1323366
So few people follow /f/ rule one that it legally stopped existing.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/20/10(Tue)11:28 No.1323436
>>1323416
So. Archdeacon of the Roman Catholic church here. Just figured I'd set you straight on that one,
although I usually avoid these threads.
The holy bible was not written solely by Paul. Portions of it were written by Paul. Portions of
it were also written by the other Apostles, as well as a number of uncredited authors, and none
of the actual text was penned by God himself save for the Ten commandments of the first great
covenant. That includes Revelations. In fact, we're still not entirely sure that Revelations was
written by an apostle at all.
Regardless, the bible was written by man, THROUGH the holy influence of God. It was not written
directly through God, as evidenced by the nature of the text itself.
As I noted before, and as is noted in the Catechisms, canon law states that the ONLY portion of
the bible directly penned by the Lord himself are the ten commandments.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/20/10(Tue)11:29 No.1323438
>>1323436
so, if you choose to disregard the rest of it, which I consider to be just as foolish as
disregarding ANY penned warning of ANY kind... that's ultimately your decision.
But keep in mind that those ten lines of text I mentioned... THOSE are God talking directly to
you.
The rest of them are God sending someone else to give you a message. You might want to take it
with a grain of salt... but it might not hurt you to listen.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/20/10(Tue)11:32 No.1323441
>>1323436
so all that kidfucking is god's doing too? also what's with that funky smell that's always
hanging around the place with the pews? It's pretty fucked up.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/20/10(Tue)11:40 No.1323453
The bible was wrote by mans to control mans like the god they wish to be.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/20/10(Tue)12:22 No.1323476
it's something you need to understand\
>> [_] Anonymous !!LJ3Ub+SjkCA 07/20/10(Tue)12:24 No.1323477
The bible is false, it says so right here.
Checkmate, Christians.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/20/10(Tue)12:29 No.1323482
ultimate argument:
Assumptions:
1) God is all good
2) God is all knowing
3) God is all powerful
4) there is evil in the world
Argument:
A) If god is (2) all knowing, and there is (4) evil in the world, then god know that there is
evil.
B) If god is (1) all good, then god would not allow there to be (4) evil in the world
C) If god is (3) all powerful, then he could stop the (4) evil in the world
D) By (A and B and C) there is (4) evil in the world then (2) God is all good must be false
E) if (2) god is all good then (A and B and C) or (A and false and C) must be false, therefore
god must either not be all powerful, all knowing or all good
though there's obviously no place for science or reason...
>> [_] God 07/20/10(Tue)12:31 No.1323483
Hi guys, God here...
the bible: i did it for teh lulz... you thought it was srs business? LULZ!
>> [_] Anonymous 07/20/10(Tue)12:35 No.1323484
>>1323482
Buddy. You haven't seen this then, have you?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2JgpARGvBnc
I'm not religious at all but that argument is stupid and even science proves that wrong.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/20/10(Tue)12:35 No.1323485
hello.
you are a chef.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/20/10(Tue)12:40 No.1323486
"science and reason have no place in our lives..'
god damn i pity them..
There should be a fund for people so mentally handicapped.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/20/10(Tue)12:50 No.1323491
>>1323484
This is funny, and sounds reasonable, but it overlooks the fact that 'cold' and 'darkness' are in
fact synonyms to "absence of heat/light".. "Evil" as they call it is not exactly a synonym of
absence of good. Evil can be studied and observed. Also, evil can not be measured like
temperature or light intensity. Therefor the laws of physics/science will never call evil the
absence of good..
>> [_] Anonymous 07/20/10(Tue)12:53 No.1323493
>>1323484
I'm sorry but did you say "even science proves that wrong"
I hope you know how retarded that sounds. His argument, and the video in youtube use REASONING.
Science is about empirical evidence and the conclusion you can draw from that data, so unless you
happen to have a study providing evidence for the non existence of evil, you can eat a dick.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/20/10(Tue)12:55 No.1323494
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p9izVu_TtAE&feature=related
this
>> [_] Anonymous 07/20/10(Tue)12:56 No.1323495
>>1323491
I know. But evil also cannot be studied because it's an opinion. What's evil to one person is not
necessarily evil to another. People don't do something they view as wrong without being forced.
In order for someone to willingly do something they must believe to themselves that they're doing
what's right. Thus, to them, they are not evil.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/20/10(Tue)12:58 No.1323496
I'll just leave this here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qVpvCAIO_-E
>> [_] Anonymous 07/20/10(Tue)12:59 No.1323498
>>1323491
no shit it's a philosophical position. Science has absolutely nothing to fucking do with religion.
Also evil can't be studied and observed. It's a moral position, what's evil to one person isn't
evil to another.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/20/10(Tue)13:01 No.1323500
>>1323495
>>1323498
Hey we agree on something. How were you capable of reasoning that out yet still uttering a term
like "science proves you wrong" in a philosophical argument?
>> [_] Anonymous 07/20/10(Tue)13:05 No.1323502
>>1323500
Oh. Because I was just spewing shit back there. I enjoyed that Albert Einstein video but realized
the flaws long ago. I had intended to list all his steps as he labeled them and point out all the
flaws but decided instead to just link a video a write some random shit.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/20/10(Tue)13:05 No.1323503
If you're an atheist, and failed to realize this is an obvious hyperbole meant to mock
Christians, you ought to be ashamed.
Idiots like you guys are the ones that convert back when things get rough or you get the chance
to have a religious girlfriend.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/20/10(Tue)13:07 No.1323506
>>1323498
>>1323495
I hate to burst your bubble but you are actually studying/ philosophizing about evil. But anyway,
yeah its subjective. And i was also going for the "even science proves that wrong" comment
>> [_] Anonymous 07/20/10(Tue)13:09 No.1323507
>>1323503
First, I realized that's what this was while watching it. It's really quite obvious. I continued
to post because it's fun to leave comments.
Second, I actually have a catholic girlfriend.
And third, I'm agnostic because I really don't have any proof that any God exists or doesn't and
I'm not going to start running around blathering on about how one does or does not.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/20/10(Tue)13:13 No.1323512
>>1323503
There are some who really are as Christian as the person talking in this flash. The flash
humorously highlights some of his talk, much like other theory-parody flashes. It is not uncommon
for a "serious" speaker to be put in a flash like this. If the speaker happens to be fake, then
it would be a hyperbole.
Also your post implies every atheist is a converted christian/monotheist .. personal experiences?
>> [_] Anonymous 07/20/10(Tue)13:16 No.1323515
How2Reason:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yNocC85MU6w&feature=related
Checkmate.jpg
>> [_] Anonymous 07/20/10(Tue)13:33 No.1323522
>>1323507
#1 - You got it, so I'm not talking about you, am I?
#2 - And mine's a jew, good for you.
#3 - Agnostic is a sub-group of atheist. If you don't officially acknowledge a diety of your own,
you're an atheist. What you call an agnostic is what some call a weak atheist. It's not really up
for debate, it's the definition.
>>1323512
It's his manner of speaking, he's clearly being sarcastic. Serious speakers on the matter tend to
be either aggressive, know-it-all, or kinda space-casey.
>Also your post implies every atheist is a converted christian/monotheist .. personal experiences
"Every"? No. "Most"? In my experience, yes. All but one of the atheists I've known personally
started out with a religious affiliation, including myself. I became an atheist when I was 9, and
actually believed in Santa longer than God, because at least there was some level of evidence for
santa. Those crafty parents.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/20/10(Tue)13:41 No.1323525
>>1323522
Main Entry: 1ag·nos·tic
Pronunciation: \ag-ˈnäs-tik, əg-\
Function: noun
Etymology: Greek agnōstos unknown, unknowable, from a- + gnōstos known, from gignōskein to know —
more at know
Date: 1869
1 : a person who holds the view that any ultimate reality (as God) is unknown and probably
unknowable; broadly : one who is not committed to believing in either the existence or the
nonexistence of God or a god
Hmm. I don't see. "A subgroup of atheist" anywhere in that definition.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/20/10(Tue)13:46 No.1323528
>>1323522
Main Entry: athe·ist
Pronunciation: \ˈā-thē-ist\
Function: noun
Date: 1551
: one who believes that there is no deity
In case you were going to throw in the definition of atheist. Both are from Merriam-Webster.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/20/10(Tue)13:46 No.1323531
lolololol
that was awesome
>> [_] Anonymous 07/20/10(Tue)13:49 No.1323532
this shit is so unfunny...all the sarcasm is lost coz the narrator tries too hard to be witty...
>> [_] Anonymous 07/20/10(Tue)13:54 No.1323540
>>1323525
atheism:
Disbelief in, or denial of, the existence of a god.
deny:
To contradict or gainsay (anything stated or alleged); to declare to be untrue or untenable, or
not what it is stated to be.
untenable:
not able to be maintained or defended against
theism:
Belief in the existence of a god or gods, especially belief in a personal God as creator and
ruler of the world
a- prefix:
without
Atheism is, when deconstructed, a very broad term. The original definition has been altered
overtime to define the unreasonable strong atheists by a rather overwhelming popular opinion that
there's no middle ground. Either you worship my God or you're an ATHEIST who DENIES His divinity.
Politics and common use have tainted its meaning, but its original meaning is regaining
popularity.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/20/10(Tue)13:54 No.1323542
yawn religion bashing is so old
nobody cares about retarded religions anymore
>> [_] Anonymous 07/20/10(Tue)14:02 No.1323550
>>1323522
I guess his sarcasm is noticeable, sure.
And ah i see. I grew up in an environment where most people started as atheists, and the ones who
were religious weren't so extreme in believing, rather then been raised in a certain way. And
heh, i envy your parents attempts, i think my parents just said "whatchu want for christmass,
this is the budget" >,<
>> [_] Anonymous 07/20/10(Tue)14:05 No.1323553
WOULD YOU BELIEVE IN A FLYING SPAGHETTI MONSTER??
HUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHEU
>> [_] Anonymous 07/20/10(Tue)14:06 No.1323556
>>1323540
Well, that may be true. I simply don't wish to be associated with a group that does not
completely represent my views. It's why I vote independent and why I choose to be labeled
agnostic and not atheist. I do not deny the existence of God or Gods, nor do I support it. I
don't believe that makes me a "weak" atheist. If anything it makes me a non-extreme atheist.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/20/10(Tue)14:07 No.1323558
>>1323553
OH HELL YEAH! FUCKING TASTY! IT WOULD SOLVE WORLD HUNGER.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/20/10(Tue)14:10 No.1323562
>>1323550
I'm reminded of the yearly "sparring matches" my family and I would have. I'd try to sneak out at
just the right time to catch them in the act of placing presents, and of course, nothing was out,
they'd say he didn't show up yet, I'd go to sleep and they'd get me every year. I even hid
somewhere in the living room overnight, and fell the fuck asleep instead of remaining vigilant.
Anyway, where I grew up there were a lot of weak religious types "omg you don't believe in god?
that's bad or whatever. let's play video games you heathen lololol", with a light sprinking of
batshit devouts.
