File[GREEN_FLOAT_-_a_Floating_City_in_the_Sky_DigInfo.swf] - (7.6 MB)
[_] [?] Anonymous 04/13/11(Wed)22:36 No.1496226
>> [_] Anonymous 04/13/11(Wed)22:41 No.1496228
Holy shit.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/14/11(Thu)01:56 No.1496282
I wouldn't live there.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/14/11(Thu)02:02 No.1496284
BOOOOOOOORING
>> [_] Anonymous 04/14/11(Thu)02:27 No.1496293
anyone know about the game brink coming out?
yeah... this made me think about it.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/14/11(Thu)03:14 No.1496315
>>1496293
Same. I was thinking ITS THE ARK!!!
Also, what about typhoons?
>> [_] Anonymous 04/14/11(Thu)04:17 No.1496336
theeee uhhh waste going back down wouldnt be enough to sustain a natural cycle - would still need
to import dirt or dredge up ocean dirt or something
>> [_] Anonymous 04/14/11(Thu)04:23 No.1496337
>>1496336
It's not supposed to be a 100% self-sustaining system and they never claim as such you idiot.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/14/11(Thu)05:13 No.1496344
The idea is actually a fairly good one, but I think the main problem would be the floating of the
"islands". Say you want to go travel... You'd pretty much be fucked. If it's only 1km wide (or
was that the radius?), that's not a whole lot of room for people to go in and out. Helicopter to
go from island to island, but if you're floating in the middle of the sea, a helicopter isn't
going to get you far.
Besides, flowing with the currents would take you north and south, wouldn't it? There'd have to
be something that would lock it in a somewhat "regional" area.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/14/11(Thu)05:42 No.1496346
>implying amount of resources consumed to create would ever be outweighed by resources saved by
operation
>> [_] Anonymous 04/14/11(Thu)09:08 No.1496386
It's still more feasible than anythign the Zeitspammers ever came up with.
