File: Raspberry_heaven.swf-(795 KB, 370x300, Japanese)
[_] Anon 3349548
>> [_] Anon 3349632 classic
>> [_] Anon 3349647 This song brings me to tears. It's incredibly nostalgic

File: Raspberry_Heaven_neko.swf-(795 KB, 370x300, Japanese)
[_] Anon 2777815

File: Raspberry_Heaven_neko.swf-(795 KB, 370x300, Other)
[_] Anon 2617503
>> [_] Anon 2617541 Older than old school

File: Raspberry_heaven.swf-(795 KB, 370x300, Anime)
[_] Request inside Anon 2051720 >>>/q/705168 Go here. Discuss your current thoughts on /f/'s condition.
>> [_] Anon 2051723 >># >The only real improvement it's had is the [embed] option Stopped reading there.
>> [_] Anon 2051725 >># >/f/ isn't entirely unloved. It did get a reasonable overhaul a while back, same time as the limit was raised from 8MB to 10MB. Plus, we've just gotten the [Embed] link recently too.
>> [_] Anon 2051738 >># >a while back /f/ got tons of things fixed in the past couple of months (and it keeps getting bug fixes every week) but all you nerds notice is gimmick toy ``features'' such as embedding. Take this thread for example. Embedding a true vector flash inside a tiny 370x300 frame is pointless. These flashes look much betting in full screen.
>> [_] Anon 2051741 At least /f/ now links properly to itself. It used to try to go to image.4channel.org which was a broken link whenever you clicked on a .swf. Then there was when it was broken to boards.4chan.org when clicking on .swf which resulted in a 404. Lets not forget when 4chan moved from being 4chan.org/(board/server letter) and /f/ was not switched over to the image.4chan for months. Holy fuck I need to get off of /f/.
>> [_] Anon 2051742 >># >/f/ got tons of things fixed in the past couple of months (and it keeps getting bug fixes every week) but all you nerds notice is gimmick toy ``features'' such as embedding. Then bring them up in the thread and point out that the OP's a faggot. Doesn't change the fact that there's an error when reposting the same text twice, though.
>> [_] Anon 2051748 >># >/f/ got tons of things fixed in the past couple of months (and it keeps getting bug fixes every week) but all you nerds notice is gimmick toy ``features'' such as embedding. Fixing bugs and implementing features are two different things. People don't notice when bugs are fixed, because it's about removing a problem that shouldn't have come about in the first place.
>> [_] Anon 2051783 I preferred the longer reposts times over the day long ones. Now it's just monotonous.
>> [_] Anon 2051787 >># >delays It's just placebo. At least new content now has more exposition. Before it was: post something new, it dies 3 hours later. End of story, you'll have to wait 4 days if you want to show it to more people.
>> [_] f4r !HanakoDlmg 2051795 >># >there's an error when reposting the same text twice Try posting something original then, instead of just shitting up the place.
>> [_] Anon 2051806 >># I'm just pointing out there's an issue with the filter. Don't be a faggot about this.
>> [_] f4r !HanakoDlmg 2051807 >># How is that an issue? Sounds like it's working just fine to me.
>> [_] Anon 2051813 >># The filters are overlapping and registering incorrectly so that as long as a post stays up, it cannot be posted again. It also refers to "posts" as "threads". Seems to me like there should be separate filters regarding threads and posts, much like what we have on any other board.
>> [_] f4r !HanakoDlmg 2051820 >># What are you trying to post that's so common anyway? Comments shouldn't be so unoriginal that they can be caught in a filter like this.
>> [_] Anon 2051826 >># Is that really a problem, though?
>> [_] Anon 2051828 >># >Comments shouldn't be so unoriginal that they can be caught in a filter like this. If /f/ was actually a suitable board for discussion, then I might actually agree with you. /f/ and originality don't exactly go hand in hand.
>> [_] Anon 2051829 >># >registering incorrectly so that as long as a post stays up No, it "fades out" after 20 posts (yours or not). You can post "cocks", then 20 posts later you can repost it again. The issue is that the message seems to be incorrect ("thread" instead of "reply")
>> [_] Anon 2051831 >># First off, new content doesn't have more exposition, because those new flashes 404 much faster now. Before, you could have the front page up for hours and just click links as you please without having half of them be down. The whole "dies 3 hours later" thing is much more true NOW, compared to before. Secondly, how is it any good to post the same thing twice within four days? Reposting your OC over and over just makes you look like a faggot.
>> [_] Anon 2051835 >># It's worth mentioning, and it's clearly an unintended consequence considering that it refers to the "post" as a "thread". To me, it's just an indication of how much effort is put into maintaining /f/. If the filter can't make a distinction between threads and posts, then it's obviously not on par with the rest of the site.
>> [_] Anon 2051836 >># There's a massive difference between two text fields posted within a short interval of each other being the exact same and posting the same flash twice a week.
>> [_] Anon 2051839 >># I wrote your post on a piece of paper and put it in a pot with boiling water. After things cooled down, the paper read "No, it isn't a problem."
>> [_] Anon 2051850 >># That's beautifully written. But I'd still like to see a distinction made within the filter for the sake of professionalism.
>> [_] Anon 2051851 >># >Before When the board was still small, sure. >Reposting your OC over and over Nobody said anything about spamming over and over the same files. In any case, once again, delays won't change much if there are no new contributions. That's why it's placebo, because in the end, you will still see the same stale content over and over again. Also, abusing delays is very easy, all you have to do is add a null byte at the end of the file to bypass the filter. tl;dr: it's all about new content and the community. Increased delays won't bring new contributions.
>> [_] Anon 2051855 >># >If the filter can't make a distinction between threads and posts, It's just the error message for god's sake. The bug is that the message is wrong. Only the message.
>> [_] Anon 2051867 >># I just tried reposting: >No, it "fades out" after 20 posts (yours or not). >Wait, what? >I'm gonna try this. You're wrong. The error remains until the post is gone.
>> [_] Anon 2051873 >># It must be the number of threads then, not replies.
>> [_] Anon 2051875 >># >No, it "fades out" after 20 posts (yours or not). Wait, what? I'm gonna try this.
>> [_] Anon 2051876 >># Nope. It's definitely until it's deleted.
>> [_] Anon 2051879 >># I assure you, it's not. It's "something" - 20. I don't remember if it's threads or replies. In any case, it's not a bug, this flood filter was always there.
>> [_] Testman The Tester !2vlFukDhqg 2051891 testing
>> [_] Testman The Tester !2vlFukDhqg 2051913 testing
>> [_] Anon 2051915 >># >># #rekt #yolo #swag
>> [_] Anon 2051918 The song brings back so much nostalgia...back when it seemed like any random anime series was an enjoyable experience.

File: Raspberry_heaven.swf-(795 KB, Japanese)
[_] Anon 1985100 Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anon 1985103 >Raspberry >No Onara Disappointed
>> [_] Anon 1985298 I watched this for about 2 seconds >Nope.JPG
>> [_] Anon 1985356 aumanga ending!

Unrecognized thread format. File :[Raspberry_heaven.swf] - (814 KB) [_] [J] Anon 832266 /r/-ing 2ch ending version of this. >> [_] Anon 832430 Bump, because [J] is rare these days... >> [_] Anon 832436 sage because [J] is rare for a reason. >> [_] Anon 832450 >># Yep, because shitty [L]s and fake [H]s are much more fun. >> [_] Anon 832539 bumping because i'm looking for that flash too. >> [_] Anon 832544 al;s'dgj