File[kissyfur.swf] - (3.49 MB)
[_] [L] Problem furfags? Anonymous 08/03/11(Wed)04:00 No.

>> [_] Anonymous 08/03/11(Wed)05:39 No.

  you can't spell anthropomorphic-bestiality without bestiality
  enjoy your dog fucking
  freaks

>> [_] Anonymous 08/03/11(Wed)05:40 No.

  >copyrighted by the animal rights group
  >animal rights group created the video
  >shots that couldn't have been gotten without consent of the outfit doing it
  >no corporation would allow that
  >also skinning is much easier and more efficient when the animal is dead and thus not struggling
  >this is much more easily accomplshed by breaking the neck than whacking on the ground
  >video depicts incredibly unprofitable behavior that, if practiced on a corporate scale, would
  burn up millions of dollars for the sake of nothing but hurting animals and publicly admitting it
  >bottom line: animal rights group is most likely responsible for the events in the video
  Just saiyan

>> [_] Anonymous 08/03/11(Wed)06:01 No.

  >>1545137
  So, what, you're saying people do this shit to get animal rights people to film them?
  I honestly doubt that.

>> [_] Anonymous 08/03/11(Wed)06:09 No.

  >>1545139
  No, The animal rights group does this to try and get "dirt" on the corporations. I am assuming
  it's a lose a few, save many sort of thing.

>> [_] Anonymous 08/03/11(Wed)06:11 No.

  >>1545139
  I'm saying the animal rights people do this so they'll have something to film. There is no reason
  a corporation would ever do it, because it's the opposite of profitable.

>> [_] Anonymous 08/03/11(Wed)08:36 No.

  just sick

>> [_] Anonymous 08/03/11(Wed)08:53 No.

  This is revenue generating GOLD for animal rights groups.

  1) Film people, especially poor or lower income working class people abusing animals, especially
  if it's their way of making a living.

  2) Show the video to as wide an audience as possible while soliciting donations.

  3) Profit.

  GreenPeace, Peta, The Sierra Club; They all use this model.

  (They learned this from Oxfam, Save the Children, and other aid agencies who show pictures of
  starving humans to accomplish the same thing.)

>> [_] Anonymous 08/03/11(Wed)09:37 No.

  more like, problem human? Are you?

>> [_] Anonymous 08/03/11(Wed)09:53 No.

  >>1545139
  >he doesn't know about peta

  Also, I'm pretty sure furfags won't be the only ones with a problem.

>> [_] Anonymous 08/03/11(Wed)10:01 No.

  I could of gone without see that thing skinned alive. I'm not a tree hugger by any means, but
  that's just unnecessarily cruel.

>> [_] Anonymous 08/03/11(Wed)10:15 No.

  >>1545198
  I actually thought it was interesting, sure it must have hurt, but it looked like taking off a
  jacket or sweater.