File[kissyfur.swf] - (3.49 MB)
[_] [L] Problem furfags? Anonymous 08/03/11(Wed)04:00 No.1545110
>> [_] Anonymous 08/03/11(Wed)05:39 No.1545135
you can't spell anthropomorphic-bestiality without bestiality
enjoy your dog fucking
freaks
>> [_] Anonymous 08/03/11(Wed)05:40 No.1545137
>copyrighted by the animal rights group
>animal rights group created the video
>shots that couldn't have been gotten without consent of the outfit doing it
>no corporation would allow that
>also skinning is much easier and more efficient when the animal is dead and thus not struggling
>this is much more easily accomplshed by breaking the neck than whacking on the ground
>video depicts incredibly unprofitable behavior that, if practiced on a corporate scale, would
burn up millions of dollars for the sake of nothing but hurting animals and publicly admitting it
>bottom line: animal rights group is most likely responsible for the events in the video
Just saiyan
>> [_] Anonymous 08/03/11(Wed)06:01 No.1545139
>>1545137
So, what, you're saying people do this shit to get animal rights people to film them?
I honestly doubt that.
>> [_] Anonymous 08/03/11(Wed)06:09 No.1545142
>>1545139
No, The animal rights group does this to try and get "dirt" on the corporations. I am assuming
it's a lose a few, save many sort of thing.
>> [_] Anonymous 08/03/11(Wed)06:11 No.1545143
>>1545139
I'm saying the animal rights people do this so they'll have something to film. There is no reason
a corporation would ever do it, because it's the opposite of profitable.
>> [_] Anonymous 08/03/11(Wed)08:36 No.1545166
just sick
>> [_] Anonymous 08/03/11(Wed)08:53 No.1545174
This is revenue generating GOLD for animal rights groups.
1) Film people, especially poor or lower income working class people abusing animals, especially
if it's their way of making a living.
2) Show the video to as wide an audience as possible while soliciting donations.
3) Profit.
GreenPeace, Peta, The Sierra Club; They all use this model.
(They learned this from Oxfam, Save the Children, and other aid agencies who show pictures of
starving humans to accomplish the same thing.)
>> [_] Anonymous 08/03/11(Wed)09:37 No.1545188
more like, problem human? Are you?
>> [_] Anonymous 08/03/11(Wed)09:53 No.1545190
>>1545139
>he doesn't know about peta
Also, I'm pretty sure furfags won't be the only ones with a problem.
>> [_] Anonymous 08/03/11(Wed)10:01 No.1545198
I could of gone without see that thing skinned alive. I'm not a tree hugger by any means, but
that's just unnecessarily cruel.
>> [_] Anonymous 08/03/11(Wed)10:15 No.1545210
>>1545198
I actually thought it was interesting, sure it must have hurt, but it looked like taking off a
jacket or sweater.
