File[Are_Jobs_Obsolete.swf] - (107 KB)
[_] [L] Anonymous 02/10/12(Fri)18:47 No.

>> [_] Anonymous 02/10/12(Fri)18:55 No.

  wtf I actually just read that entire thing.

>> [_] Anonymous 02/10/12(Fri)19:42 No.

  sage, copy pasta your hippie shit on a different board

>> [_] Anonymous 02/10/12(Fri)19:46 No.

  durr... technology robs people of their jobs! Lets tear up the railroad tracks and fucking carry
  everything!

  economic ignorance, economic ignorance everywhere!

>> [_] Anonymous 02/10/12(Fri)19:47 No.

  loop thet said

>> [_] Anonymous 02/10/12(Fri)19:51 No.

  >implying we live post-scarcity

>> [_] Anonymous 02/10/12(Fri)20:01 No.

  they sure are, that's why I can't find one :(

>> [_] Anonymous 02/10/12(Fri)20:02 No.

  but down the blunt, get off your lazy hippy ass and get a fucking job

>> [_] Anonymous 02/10/12(Fri)20:05 No.

  I am in fundamental disagreement.
  The reason corporations were formed wasn't because the aristocracy wanted to ensure they held
  control over the resources.
  It's because mass production and centralized/specialized industry is 1000X more efficient than
  each man producing his own stuff and trading. It's precisely what allowed for the surplus he's
  talking about in all the goods we have. And the people who manage those factories are the
  business class.

>> [_] Anonymous 02/10/12(Fri)20:06 No.

  I am in fundamental agreement that unemployment is not necessarily a bad thing, and that we need
  to learn how to organize a society such that unemployment doesn't mean lacking the means to live.
  He's right, the machines and modern technology do result in unemployment, but it ideally
  shouldn't be an issue because the entire ultimate justification for modernization of technology
  to produce goods and services is that people can then do less work, or at least concentrate more
  on what's important to them and less on working for simple sustenance.

>> [_] Anonymous 02/10/12(Fri)20:30 No.

  Jobs is not obsolete, he's dead.
  Hm, am outta here.

>> [_] Anonymous 02/10/12(Fri)20:46 No.

  TL;DR

>> [_] Anonymous 02/10/12(Fri)20:47 No.

  >>1617120
  haha :D that's terrible

>> [_] Anonymous 02/10/12(Fri)21:09 No.

  Stop fucking posting this garbage.

>> [_] Anonymous 02/10/12(Fri)21:14 No.

  >>1617101
  >>we need to learn how to organize a society such that unemployment doesn't mean lacking the
  means to live
  Okay. Go ahead. Figure it out. Get back to us if you ever do.