File[Science_is_nonsense.swf] - (7.83 MB)
[_] [L] Anonymous 03/17/12(Sat)22:00 No.1638654
>> [_] Anonymous 03/17/12(Sat)22:34 No.1638662
the selection of music in this is making me a believer in zeitgeist
>> [_] Anonymous 03/17/12(Sat)22:50 No.1638669
god DAMN it people quit being fucking stupid
The scientific method is a way to figure shit out.
THAT'S ALL.
And there's nothing wrong with it.
Just faggotry.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/17/12(Sat)22:53 No.1638671
>>1638669
I think the whole point is "scientific method" is handwavium for the "perfect future" vision
inherent to Zeitgeist. "How will our government be run? SCIENCE!!!!!!!!"
>> [_] Anonymous 03/18/12(Sun)00:18 No.1638723
this is actually got me interested in using the Scientific Method again
Forgot about for a few years
>> [_] Anonymous 03/18/12(Sun)01:14 No.1638743
It's funny how people still associate Zeitgeist with TVP, despite the split due to Zeitgeist
going rogue.
On subject: Why do people keep commenting in such a biased form on something that they've only
done surface research on? Sounds like *this* one grabbed 'scientific method' from somewhere and
did deeper research on that than what he was actually trying to comment on. Also funny that he
didn't remember it from high school, and actually had to do research on it at all. >.>;
>> [_] Anonymous 03/18/12(Sun)02:25 No.1638773
He is correct. The scientific method in itself cannot be used as an answer to a question.
It is just that, a method. You use the scientific method to answer questions.
Thus saying you will delegate resource management with "the scientific method" is indeed a
nonsense statement.
But he's not saying anything about the scientific method itself being nonsense. In fact he's
making it clear that it's basically the best tool of logic in existence.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/18/12(Sun)02:47 No.1638778
mfw "interpretate"
