/ > /show/ > Thread 30323 Age: 50.03d Health: 0% Posters: 1 Posts: 1 Replies: 0 Files: 1+2
>> Anon 96553 [IMG] Zeitgeist movement Science_is_nonsense.swf (7.84 MiB) 426x240, Compressed (Deflate). 7272 frames, 29.97 fps (04:03). Ver8, AS1/AS2. Network access: Text: Yes. Bitmaps: Yes. Audio: Yes. Video: Yes. [find in archive]

File[Science_is_nonsense.swf] - (7.83 MB)
[_] [L] Anon 1638654
>> [_] Anon 1638662 the selection of music in this is making me a believer in zeitgeist
>> [_] Anon 1638669 god DAMN it people quit being fucking stupid The scientific method is a way to figure shit out. THAT'S ALL. And there's nothing wrong with it. Just faggotry.
>> [_] Anon 1638671 >># I think the whole point is "scientific method" is handwavium for the "perfect future" vision inherent to Zeitgeist. "How will our government be run? SCIENCE!!!!!!!!"
>> [_] Anon 1638723 this is actually got me interested in using the Scientific Method again Forgot about for a few years
>> [_] Anon 1638743 It's funny how people still associate Zeitgeist with TVP, despite the split due to Zeitgeist going rogue. On subject: Why do people keep commenting in such a biased form on something that they've only done surface research on? Sounds like *this* one grabbed 'scientific method' from somewhere and did deeper research on that than what he was actually trying to comment on. Also funny that he didn't remember it from high school, and actually had to do research on it at all. >.>;
>> [_] Anon 1638773 He is correct. The scientific method in itself cannot be used as an answer to a question. It is just that, a method. You use the scientific method to answer questions. Thus saying you will delegate resource management with "the scientific method" is indeed a nonsense statement. But he's not saying anything about the scientific method itself being nonsense. In fact he's making it clear that it's basically the best tool of logic in existence.
>> [_] Anon 1638778 mfw "interpretate"