File[DOFTest.swf] - (7.11 MB)
[_] [H] 01_9 Anonymous 04/11/12(Wed)21:31 No.

  DOFT Test

Marked for deletion (old).

>> [_] Anonymous 04/11/12(Wed)21:42 No.

  I dig it.
  If you're going for lulz, I'd recommend you watch "DESTROYASS.swf" if you haven't already.
  Classic.

>> [_] Anonymous 04/11/12(Wed)21:44 No.

  OP Here

  It take while to load, sorry

>> [_] Anonymous 04/11/12(Wed)21:49 No.

  What's with her tongue?
  >cannot unsee

>> [_] Anonymous 04/11/12(Wed)21:50 No.

  Dat tongue.

>> [_] Anonymous 04/11/12(Wed)22:00 No.

  looking good, has some serious potential

>> [_] Anonymous 04/11/12(Wed)22:07 No.

  OP Here

  >>1654606 Thanks

  >>1654590 I was testing how long her tongue can go on with the values I set for the limits. Did
  not put it back when I rendered it :P

>> [_] Anonymous 04/11/12(Wed)22:09 No.

  Hey guys?

  Whats going on guys?

>> [_] Anonymous 04/11/12(Wed)22:14 No.

  good stuff, please continue with your works

>> [_] Anonymous 04/11/12(Wed)22:18 No.

  >>1654623

  Thank you :)

>> [_] Anonymous 04/11/12(Wed)22:30 No.

  TOONAMI FTW. Sorry, but this reminds me of Tom.

>> [_] Anonymous 04/11/12(Wed)22:40 No.

  >>1654640
  ...
  D:

  This is soundleechperson. I do not know anything about making flash, sorry. Keep asking around
  though, once in a while a really helpful person strolls along.

  I'm impressed with the great looks of what you've made. Are you going to school for something
  that's helped you with this or something?

>> [_] Anonymous 04/11/12(Wed)22:45 No.

  >>1654650

  Self- taught (and it shows :P). I've just started about October 2011. I just started animating in
  February.

>> [_] Anonymous 04/11/12(Wed)22:48 No.

  >>1654657 By the way... Robosex OP here. :P

>> [_] Anonymous 04/11/12(Wed)22:55 No.

  >>1654661

  What program did you use to make this? Maya, 3ds max? B-b-b..... Blender?

>> [_] Anonymous 04/11/12(Wed)22:59 No.

  Needs more jiggle physics.

>> [_] Anonymous 04/11/12(Wed)23:01 No.

  OP Here

  >>1654668

  I used Carrara 8 PRO. I made the Models in Hexagon 2.5... for some reason Blender's User
  Interface Make my eyeball's hurt.

  Maya is the program I want to use in the future. :)

>> [_] Anonymous 04/11/12(Wed)23:02 No.

  walked in thinking Toonami?

>> [_] Anonymous 04/11/12(Wed)23:05 No.

  >>1654676

  Shit son, start learning now.

  I took maya and 3ds Max, maya is definitely the harder one to learn, but it is true and true, the
  end all of 3d programs.

  I can hook you up with tons of material related to it and get you well on your way to learning it
  if you want. Always willing to help out a 3D-ude.

>> [_] Anonymous 04/11/12(Wed)23:09 No.

  OP Here

  >>1654674

  The 3d Program I use sadly doesn't have the great Physics capabilties that you nornally see from
  the good stuff.

  Either that, or I havem't figured it out yet. I've tried , but I'll have to try harder. :)

  Apparenty >>1654404 has enough Physics for everyone... but I know that's what you are not looking
  for :P

>> [_] Anonymous 04/11/12(Wed)23:30 No.

  >>1654674

  Here is a walking loop (not H) with some jiggle, but its hand animated (in other words "not
  good") , some booty jiggle too if you look hard. The best I can do for now :( sorry to disappoint

  >>1654698

>> [_] Anonymous 04/11/12(Wed)23:32 No.

  It has potential but as hentai that potential is limited, because the sexual element, the girl,
  isn't the focus of the movie. it's a big robot you are showing off.

>> [_] Anonymous 04/11/12(Wed)23:46 No.

  Watching this and DESTROYASS.swf at the same time has levels of irony none of us may fully
  appreciate.

  Its also funny how well the music fits.

  As a 2D animator who started out in 3D I probably appreciate it more than most people. The irony,
  I mean. Not the flash.

>> [_] Anonymous 04/11/12(Wed)23:57 No.

  OP Here

  >>1654704

  Thank You, that was very good advice, and I understand exactly what you mean, but honestly I've
  been trying to think of how to fix the focus issue. That position makes it really hard to focus
  on her. I do have to work on positioning. Do you think it's the position itself? or design (robot
  draws more attention)? or something else?

>> [_] Anonymous 04/12/12(Thu)00:07 No.

  >>1654723
  well, i'm no expert but it seems like the robot is just way more eye-catching than the girl.
  i suppose one one obvious way to rectify this would be to 'tone-down' the appearance of the
  background and robot so the girl is noticed more.
  or you could play with camera angles like you mentioned.
  or maybe there's some creative solution I'm not thinking of.

>> [_] Anonymous 04/12/12(Thu)00:09 No.

  >>1654723

  Alright OP, I'm going to show you something that is extremely similar to this. You can gain some
  hints through these videos.

  http://www.youpornose.com/video/154265/3dgspot-presents-doppelganger

  http://www.youpornose.com/video/154198/3dgspot-presents-doppelganger-2

  These act a lot like how you are performing the positions, except the roles are reversed in the
  videos.

  I'm sure they will help you.

>> [_] Anonymous 04/12/12(Thu)00:12 No.

  >>1654723

  Light effects on the robot draw more attention to it than anything.

  High volumes of light in low light situations always draw the eye. I like how you used the light
  on her armor and such. Skin vs robot with fancy lights, the robot wins every time.

  I would suggest toning down on the luminosity on the lights, making them more opaque and faintly
  glowy.

>> [_] Anonymous 04/12/12(Thu)00:12 No.

  Alright, I'm willing to get past the face if this shit is going to be this good.

>> [_] Anonymous 04/12/12(Thu)00:18 No.

  >>1654729

  Thanks, your input is very helpful. I think I have to overcome Creator's Bias, which is causing
  me to try to show the big picture., with fly around cameras (I do love fly around cameras :P)

>> [_] Anonymous 04/12/12(Thu)00:20 No.

  >>1654723

  Hi, obnoxious 2d animator here again. You weren't talking to me but I'm going to give you my
  advice.

  Get some paper or a 2d program and animate it old school first. I promise you it'll be a huge
  learning experience.

  3D character animation is this weird hybrid monster no mortal man can master. It's not so much
  what its capable of, its the way in which its done which guarantee's failure. Its great as a tool
  for games but if you're just trying to communicate something through an image you're probably
  better off sticking to 2D. There's no soul to it.

>> [_] Anonymous 04/12/12(Thu)00:22 No.

  >>1654740

  Also, I've never heard a 2D animator say they wish they were doing their project in 3D.

  2D animators are begrudged towards the volume of work involved in their art, but its more like an
  old married couple who always complain about each other but its really just because they love
  each other so much.

  3D animation is this quest for reality through art...there's always some new tool that must be
  developed or some streamlined process which must be understood. The key word being always. No
  matter how good you get it, it won't be "real".

>> [_] ofuckwy !/IPyUlClgk 04/12/12(Thu)00:28 No.

  pretty good job OP for someone so new and all.

  You should enter a name/name and trip code, so you dont have to keep saying OP Here

>> [_] Anonymous 04/12/12(Thu)00:34 No.

  This is the worst flash and you should feel the worst. If you spend more than three minutes on
  this, please reevaluate your life.

>> [_] Anonymous 04/12/12(Thu)00:41 No.

  OP Here

  >>1654740

  I accept all Input. I would not consider you obnoxious, I just noticed now that you posted
  earlier.

  Your points are very valid, and I totally understand your views. My skills in general are
  limited, and I have a lot to learn. I also have always notice that 2D and 3D Have different feels
  to them, much like still art and animated art. I appreciated the very thoughtful Advice and for
  sharing your view with me.

>> [_] Anonymous 04/12/12(Thu)00:53 No.

  >>1654748

  Thanks. I'll consider it for next time I post something here

  >>1654763 yeah,I know :P

>> [_] Anonymous 04/12/12(Thu)01:22 No.

  OP Here
  sorry ofuckwy, not yet. :)

  I sorry I didn't see some of these post earlier...

  >>1654732

  Thank you. My intro is very similar, but the girl is walking in, and mine's looks well, ya know,
  worse. :P

  >>1654734

  Thank You Very Much. My lighting skills are not great. Hopefully,Your advice will show up in my
  work when I use it (I definitely will!!) , so we can start focusing on what matters :D

>> [_] Anonymous 04/12/12(Thu)01:33 No.

  >>1654782

  I wanna help you out with this. For someone who started 3d and created this after a short while I
  think you got some talent for it. You mentioned wanting someone for sound effects, and I can help
  you.

  I actually help out a 2d Animator named Rock Candy. Aside from doing his sound, you can look up
  some of his newer flashes with sound in them.

  Hit me up if you are interested: Tambur4@yahoo.com

>> [_] Anonymous 04/12/12(Thu)02:08 No.

  >>1654789

  Wow!! Thank you for your offer. I was originally looking if there was a site where I can get
  sound effects.

  I am not confident in my abilities, to consider involving others, yet. Maybe when I feel like I'm
  in a groove and in motion, I'll definitely contact you. Please do not take it the wrong way.

>> [_] Looks great! Anonymous 04/12/12(Thu)02:16 No.

  You did an awesome work on her body.
  Her tongue could be a bit shorter but it should definately be out here ;)

>> [_] Anonymous 04/12/12(Thu)02:19 No.

  >>1654801

  Not at all. I understand trying to hone your skills first. Perhaps I should also mention I took 2
  years of 3d animation at college a while ago, so the least I can do is offer sound advice toward
  the composition of structure and the placement of verticies. I can understand how frustrating
  getting the right lighting can be, or modeling a character, boning her, then finding out that
  when you try and animate her it stretches weird and the lighting makes it boldly obvious you
  fucked up. I'm always happy to offer advice.

  As far as the character is concerned, there are some things you could easily improve, but without
  knowing certain factors like if you're going for a certain toony look with exaggerated features I
  can't make a complete prognosis.

>> [_] Anonymous 04/12/12(Thu)02:23 No.

  >>1654805

  The ass looks like two basketballs, when it should curve more like footballs, and the hips are
  very disproportionate to the waist, the thighs look very fatty, yet again, something that could
  easily be overlooked if you are going for a more cartoony style. Also, I think you should
  consider re-skinning the robot dick and making it look less, organic, and more mechanical. A
  human dick on a robot doesn't make for good looks. I understand this appears to be a test of your
  current abilities, so of course you have room to spare for modification, there is plenty to
  improve.

>> [_] Anonymous 04/12/12(Thu)02:26 No.

  Mr. Op any sauce like a blog or information on where to see more of this?

>> [_] Anonymous 04/12/12(Thu)03:11 No.

  >>1654805

  Thank You. I will certainIy look forward to any more advice you have. I cannot say how much I
  greatly appreciate it.

  yeah, I was going for a cartoony look. The basketball butt and very disproportionate hip to waist
  ratio is the style that I like.

  As for the human Dick on the robot, I'm in trouble,'cause there will be two on each one,
  eventually. :P

  Thanks again. When I have more, to show, I'll be hoping to get more help.

>> [_] Anonymous 04/12/12(Thu)03:16 No.

  >>1654832
  ok ignore me for requesting sauce i guess...

>> [_] Anonymous 04/12/12(Thu)03:22 No.

  >>1654811

  No I don't. I do not have much to show.
  I only have useless things which I don't consider actually worthwhile. Plus, it's mostly not
  sexual, and just the same things tweeked little by little.

>> [_] Anonymous 04/12/12(Thu)03:24 No.

  >> 1654838

  Sorry, I did not want my reply to your post to get mixed in that one

>> [_] Anonymous 04/12/12(Thu)09:44 No.

  k