File: Destroy_the_Australian_film_industry.swf-(1.1 MB, 720x576, Other)
[_] Anonymous 08/03/14(Sun)04:51 No.

Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anonymous 08/03/14(Sun)05:06 No.

  cry more, jews

>> [_] Anonymous 08/03/14(Sun)05:11 No.

  >>2474207
  what does the Australian film industry have to do with Judaism?

  Just asking

>> [_] Anonymous 08/03/14(Sun)05:21 No.

  >great films
  >good one, wolf creek.
  >implying aus should buy over priced shit
  >supporting rupert snake murdoch
  >implying implications

  >>2474211
  everything

>> [_] Anonymous 08/03/14(Sun)05:28 No.

  >>2474211
  the only one who loses money from pirating movies is the distribution industry,
  the ones who distribute dvd/blu-ray discs, since major of the money comes from
  theaters screening in THE FIRST FUCKING WEEK, when there are available only kino-rips,
  which are mostly unwatchable

>> [_] Anonymous 08/03/14(Sun)06:58 No.

  >>2474211
  This is 4chan. Everything that they don't like, they blame on the Jews, even if there's
  absolutely zero evidence.

>> [_] Anonymous 08/03/14(Sun)07:05 No.

  >>2474211
  The individuals who suffer the most from piracy are the large corporate bodies that distribute
  the film. These individuals are, for the most part, Jewish.

>> [_] Anonymous 08/03/14(Sun)07:21 No.

  Has there been a good aussie film since Romper Stomper?

>> [_] Anonymous 08/03/14(Sun)07:22 No.

  >>2474302
  good goy

>> [_] Anonymous 08/03/14(Sun)07:30 No.

  >>2474302

  yea, like gaza.

>> [_] Anonymous 08/03/14(Sun)07:40 No.

  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cinema_of_Australia

  Australian-made movies gross around 45 millions in Australian box office, so how can piracy be
  costing 230 millions? Are they talking about the gross box office for all movies? Because that's
  over a billion (1000 millions) in Australia alone and foreign movies are probably shown in dozens
  of other countries, so 230 millions is pocket change.

  This ad's claim is either impossible or insignificant.

>> [_] Anonymous 08/03/14(Sun)07:45 No.

  >>2474328
  or a jew's tool to take all the sheckles possible

>> [_] Anonymous 08/03/14(Sun)09:08 No.

  The film industry comes up with these astronomical numbers by:

  1: Thinking every time someone views a copy on youtube, they would have paid $20 instead. Each
  view, not individual. So that cat video with 150 million views could have made $3 billion. Oh
  wait, Kangaroo Country: $30 a view.

  2: China's markets. China pirates the *fuck* out of everything.

  China is an export economy. Ergo, everything made in country is cheap, everything imported is
  relatively expensive as fuck. $30 in kiwi money is almost a week's wages for ching chong working
  the rice paddies.

  So merchants just copy movies onto disks, and sell them at local prices: ie, $1 each. The
  People's Party looks the other way, as it keeps the riff raff occupied. Besides,Industrial
  Espionage is a government sponsored industry over there.

  Hollywood is PISSED that they can't make 1.2 billion slant eyes pay a week's wage each for
  Transformers 2, and that the internet is reducing the need for distribution companies.

>> [_] Anonymous 08/03/14(Sun)10:13 No.

  >>2474203
  >implying theres such a thing as intilectual property

>> [_] Anonymous 08/03/14(Sun)10:15 No.

  Good. Fuck Australians. Worst group of people on the globe. Even worse than Turks.

>> [_] Anonymous 08/03/14(Sun)10:36 No.

  Who is the target demographic of this ad?
  It's so generic and empty I cannot imagine anyone here getting swayed by it

>> [_] Anonymous 08/03/14(Sun)10:57 No.

  >>2474426
  >>2474426
  retards, i.e. at least 50% of civilization

>> [_] Anonymous 08/03/14(Sun)10:58 No.

  >>2474426
  Australians