File: 3scientology-scam.swf-(613 KB, Loop)
[_] Anon 1919920 Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anon 1919948 Thanks for Saying it. Getting really tired about /f/, posting like 5000+ videos daily about that bullshit.
>> [_] Anon 1920001 Everything is a troll. Trust no one. The truth is out there.
>> [_] Anon 1920004 >># If I should trust no-one, doesn't that mean I shouldn't trust you, which means I shouldn't trust no-one because I can't trust you, which means I can trust you because I can trust someone, which means I can't trust you because I trust your saying that you should trust no-one ad infinitum?
>> [_] Anon 1920008 >># No, because trusting no one does not exclude trusting someone.
>> [_] Anon 1920017 pretty little thing -- spiritualized
>> [_] Anon 1920044 I don't care either way, I just want to see this stuff stop being spammed
>> [_] Anon 1920067 Let me define this semi-formally. Universe of Discourse: Things that can or cannot be trusted. Ax: x is a person. Bx: x can be trusted. ∀x(Ax -> ~Bx): For all x, if x is a person, then x can not be trusted. Original claim. ∃x(Ax & Bx): There is some x which is both a person and can be trusted. Your claim. ∀x(Ax -> ~Bx) => ~∃x(Ax & Bx) See? Contradictory by the very nature of logic. Yes, I'm autistic as fuck, but for your information I had a great deal of fun typing this whole thing out and I know slightly more about predicate logic than I did a little while ago. Also it inflates muh ego.
>> [_] Anon 1920111 i think it's hillairous that people are equating Scientologists (who are fucktarded jagoffs who want all your money and lively hood) to Zeitgeisters (who want to see the world improve and learn, and give the world a version update with new technology). it makes me sad that people dont know what the fuck they are talking about.
>> [_] Anon 1920204 >># I think it's hilarious these guys posting this shit apparently find this board an appropriate medium for their message. Do you know how many times I've heard 'Where the Hood at' in midi here?

File: 4chan.vs.zeitgeist.swf-(613 KB, Loop)
[_] sail on, so long Anon 1896029
>> [_] Anon 1896065 this is just as much propaganda as anything the zeitgeist movement has put out. Still hate them for ruining that word.
>> [_] Anon 1896067 Where does the Theosophists come from?
>> [_] Anon 1896083 I really need to investigate on why zeitgeist is so much hated around here, all I've seen from them totally stuck to what I know, what I've learned about nowadays society. The solutions they put forward might be discussable, but I don't see why they would be pointed out as propaganda etc. Sorry for my frenchfag expression.
>> [_] Anon 1896087 >># Zeitgeist was spammed hard by one guy. He even said, he did not care if he got banned over and over, he did not care if the entire board disagreed with him, he would just continue spamming indefinitely. He was range banned, which basically means he was such a pain in the ass that the mods -banned the fuck out of him forever-. Furthermore there are no "solutions" in TZM. It's pure conjecture. Based on technology we don't have. It's comparable to saying you want to start a Star Trek party, and the party line is "the world would be better if everyone had replicators!" which is a nice sentiment, but ultimately meaningless not unlike TZM
>> [_] Anon 1896088 >># Because Americas get butthurt when confronted with anything but neoconservativism.
>> [_] Anon 1896092 >># Actually there is a solution, but it may involve a fascist government and extermination of all Jews, Christians and Muslims.
>> [_] Anon 1896096 Why did anyone bother making this?
>> [_] Anon 1896099 >># Ok now I see, thanks. I'm currently trying to guess what the spammer had in his head, I assume he felt so bad about society that that bit of hope overwhelmed him, then I realise we might not give a fuck. Actually TZM does propose solutions, resource based economy etc, I didn't get in their shit for a long time and I'm not here to debate, but I guess one does not simply says that they don't have solutions to offer.
>> [_] Anon 1896118 >># You want to see what a resource based economy is? Look at Tribal Afghanistan, anywhere in China that isn't a city, any island culture that trades in chickens and goats for dowries. Nothing comes from that. It's where the human imagination goes to die.
>> [_] Anon 1896125 >># no, we get butthurt having to constantly fight against the communist bullshit that's killed 100 million people in the last century fucking idiot children still believing this puerile shit
>> [_] Anon 1896141 >># Yessss, anyone anti-capitalist is a Stalinist, and capitalism and imperialism never killed anyone amirite? <- socialist <- still thing zeitgeist is puerile bullshit though
>> [_] Anon 1896144 >># barter systems resemble capital markets more than they do resource-credit economies
>> [_] Anon 1896198 >># The term resource-based economy is applied by the Venus Project to a hypothetical economic system in which goods, services and information are free. This use of the term is found in information from Jacque Fresco It's made up meaningless word. Like true communism.
>> [_] Anon 1896208 >># Venus project are wack, but the idea of the resource-based credit economy as a way of "harnessing" the market goes back roughly 100 years. "True communism" is a misconception trotted out by both uneducated communists and anti-communists who haven't bothered to understand their opponent beyond a cursory skimming of Marx, because communism and socialism are such broad areas of ideology. The USSR, China under Mao, etc. were absolutely communist by the Stalinist definition, but neither the methods nor the end goals of the Bolsheviks are anywhere near the political programs of, say, anarchism, social democracy, christian socialism, or the various left communist/anti-state communist tendencies that sprung up in the late 20th century, all of which still claim the names of socialism or communism.