File: surprise_motherfucker.swf-(9.6 MB, 512x288, Other)
[_] bet you didn't see this coming Anonymous 04/09/16(Sat)09:25:31 No.3058612
http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/~ppzap4/response.html
Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anonymous 04/09/16(Sat)09:38:10 No.3058614
Math is awesome
>> [_] Anonymous 04/09/16(Sat)09:44:50 No.3058617
>>3058612
Fukken math.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/09/16(Sat)10:15:50 No.3058624
>how do we solve the S2?
>we randomly add to it itself of course so it's 2 times S2
>and to be more random we shift it by one palce to he right
>it's so simple
fucking math
you can do whatever with it but the thing is you need to find some kind of pattern to it so you
can create a formula and win a nobel prize
>> [_] Anonymous 04/09/16(Sat)10:20:02 No.3058626
>>3058624
It's like having autism without most of the drawbacks.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/09/16(Sat)10:41:24 No.3058635
>>3058612
jup that proves math has nothing to do with reality
we add even numbers to inginity ang get -1/12
makes perfect sense
>> [_] Anonymous 04/09/16(Sat)10:46:17 No.3058636
when the mutherfucker wont just do the simple math, dividing a half by a quarter. god damnit the
video was just elongated so he could explain shit no one understood.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/09/16(Sat)11:02:58 No.3058639
Dude I saw this years ago. Good times.
Doesn't he go on later and explain that this is important to quantum physics or something?
>> [_] Anonymous 04/09/16(Sat)11:25:33 No.3058647
>>3058635
The negative one over twelve thing is a pretty important result, it's the reason why we know how
many dimensions there are in string theory for example
>> [_] Anonymous 04/09/16(Sat)11:53:54 No.3058651
S=1+1-1+1-1+...
He assumes that S=0,5, but he hasn't proven that. By the way of course he can't prove it because
this is arithmetic sacrilege and a troll video.
Results based on a false assumption are pointless. He could have just as well used this wrong
assumption to prove that 1 is not equal to 1.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/09/16(Sat)12:05:31 No.3058654
Maths: fucked up people try to fuck you up, and succeed in doing so.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/09/16(Sat)12:06:04 No.3058655
>>3058651
They have already done a video on this.
https://youtu.be/PCu_BNNI5x4
>> [_] Anonymous 04/09/16(Sat)12:29:35 No.3058660
>>3058612
>If you wan't to find the result of an infinite sum with two different values for n=even and
n=odd you just average
NO, YOU FUCKING DON'T!
>> [_] Anonymous 04/09/16(Sat)13:07:20 No.3058675
I actually own this brown paper. It's framed and hanging above my tv in my living room. Paid
about $85 for it on eBay.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/09/16(Sat)13:17:05 No.3058679
my dick is diamonds
math boner
>> [_] Anonymous 04/09/16(Sat)13:26:23 No.3058682
>>3058660
You do actually. It's the same reason we can make the logic of .9 repeating being the same as
one, for the purposes of math.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/09/16(Sat)13:44:55 No.3058689
I mean I guess the math isn't wrong per se but what is the application of this? I mean S1 could
be an on/off step function but I dunno about the rest. Unless they are just evaluating summations
for shits and giggles.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/09/16(Sat)13:52:24 No.3058690
I'm not going to sit here and pretend like this is relevant to me or that it invokes excitement
to appear intelligent on an anonymous image board.
Boring basic ass shit that has no application unless you are a career mathematician.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/09/16(Sat)13:54:22 No.3058691
>>3058690
>boring
>> [_] Anonymous 04/09/16(Sat)13:56:49 No.3058694
>>3058689
well you have been learning math for 10 years or so it sure must be for something, right? RIGHT?
10 YEARS OF MATH FOR SOMETHING, RIGHT?
>> [_] Anonymous 04/09/16(Sat)14:20:16 No.3058707
literal autism
>> [_] Anonymous 04/09/16(Sat)14:36:26 No.3058712
>>3058635
A biologist, a logician and a mathmatician are sitting on a bench across the street from a café.
They see a person enter the café. A couple of minutes later they see two people leave the café.
The biologist says: "They multiplied."
The logician says: "There was someone already in the café."
The mathmatician says: "There are now -1 people in the café."
>> [_] Anonymous 04/09/16(Sat)14:40:27 No.3058714
>>3058682
No that's not true at all you can define the partial sum for .9... and see that the difference of
1 with this partial sum is stricly decreasing, then get the equality using convergence theorems.
The partial sum of this other series just oscillates between two values and there is no such
things as a convergence theorem for such a case. Math are made to be consistent and the reasoning
in this video is just a random asspull, by extending this kind of result you can easily show dumb
stuff like 0=1, that's why you don't just do whatever you want in mathematics...
>> [_] Anonymous 04/09/16(Sat)14:52:44 No.3058717
>>3058675
pics or it didn't happen.
post on a different board and link it here.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/09/16(Sat)14:58:42 No.3058718
>>3058717
http://imgur.com/SP1buO2
>> [_] Anonymous 04/09/16(Sat)15:07:49 No.3058723
>>3058718
Well this is cool
>> [_] Anonymous 04/09/16(Sat)15:08:19 No.3058724
>>3058718
well done anon
>> [_] Anonymous 04/09/16(Sat)15:21:18 No.3058728
>>3058718
oh dang
>> [_] Anonymous 04/09/16(Sat)15:26:49 No.3058733
>>3058718
oh fuck I though you meant just a blank brown paper
I was wondering why would someone put a blank brown paper on their wall lol
>> [_] Anonymous 04/09/16(Sat)15:27:01 No.3058734
>>3058651
see the part where he says "theres other ways to prove this" and he is stopped and the cameraman
says "we have a video on that"
>> [_] Anonymous 04/09/16(Sat)15:33:47 No.3058738
>>3058723
>>3058724
Thanks anons. I always wonder how much it would go for on an eBay auction now, but then my wall
would be bare so I think I'm just gonna keep it.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/09/16(Sat)15:37:42 No.3058740
>>3058718
delivered, lol
>> [_] Anonymous 04/09/16(Sat)15:37:57 No.3058741
>>3058612
this math is false. he should not be shifting those numbers because it makes you be adding things
you're subracting and vice versa.
His logic is unsound because he is doing improper math.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/09/16(Sat)15:40:52 No.3058742
>>3058741
It's not wrong, try it yourself.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/09/16(Sat)15:41:08 No.3058743
>>3058741
>it makes you be adding things you're subracting
kek
>> [_] Anonymous 04/09/16(Sat)15:50:37 No.3058747
>>3058741
associative property of addition allows it
same reason 2+4 is the same as 4+2 or 1-3 is the same as (-3)+1
>> [_] Anonymous 04/09/16(Sat)15:53:13 No.3058748
>>3058747
That's commutative, associative says (a+b)+c=a+(b+c).
>> [_] Anonymous 04/09/16(Sat)17:00:20 No.3058776
>>3058635
Thing is that this result is very important in a lot of real life applications. Even engineering.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/09/16(Sat)17:34:57 No.3058792
well this just came out if someone's interested in infinite amount of numbers
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SrU9YDoXE88
