STORY LOOP FURRY PORN GAMES C SERVICES [?] [R] RND POPULAR | Archived flashes: 229494 |
/disc/ · /res/ — /show/ · /fap/ · /gg/ · /swf/ | P0001 · P2575 · P5149 |
Visit the flash's index page for basic data and a list of seen names.
Threads (1):
File: surprise_motherfucker.swf-(9.6 MB, 512x288, Other) [_] bet you didn't see this coming Anon 3058612 http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/~ppzap4/resp onse.html Marked for deletion (old). >> [_] Anon 3058614 Math is awesome >> [_] Anon 3058617 >># Fukken math. >> [_] Anon 3058624 >how do we solve the S2? >we randomly add to it itself of course so it's 2 times S2 >and to be more random we shift it by one palce to he right >it's so simple fucking math you can do whatever with it but the thing is you need to find some kind of pattern to it so you can create a formula and win a nobel prize >> [_] Anon 3058626 >># It's like having autism without most of the drawbacks. >> [_] Anon 3058635 >># jup that proves math has nothing to do with reality we add even numbers to inginity ang get -1/12 makes perfect sense >> [_] Anon 3058636 when the mutherfucker wont just do the simple math, dividing a half by a quarter. god damnit the video was just elongated so he could explain shit no one understood. >> [_] Anon 3058639 Dude I saw this years ago. Good times. Doesn't he go on later and explain that this is important to quantum physics or something? >> [_] Anon 3058647 >># The negative one over twelve thing is a pretty important result, it's the reason why we know how many dimensions there are in string theory for example >> [_] Anon 3058651 S=1+1-1+1-1+... He assumes that S=0,5, but he hasn't proven that. By the way of course he can't prove it because this is arithmetic sacrilege and a troll video. Results based on a false assumption are pointless. He could have just as well used this wrong assumption to prove that 1 is not equal to 1. >> [_] Anon 3058654 Maths: fucked up people try to fuck you up, and succeed in doing so. >> [_] Anon 3058655 >># They have already done a video on this. https://youtu.be/PCu_BNNI5x4 >> [_] Anon 3058660 >># >If you wan't to find the result of an infinite sum with two different values for n=even and n=odd you just average NO, YOU FUCKING DON'T! >> [_] Anon 3058675 I actually own this brown paper. It's framed and hanging above my tv in my living room. Paid about $85 for it on eBay. >> [_] Anon 3058679 my dick is diamonds math boner >> [_] Anon 3058682 >># You do actually. It's the same reason we can make the logic of .9 repeating being the same as one, for the purposes of math. >> [_] Anon 3058689 I mean I guess the math isn't wrong per se but what is the application of this? I mean S1 could be an on/off step function but I dunno about the rest. Unless they are just evaluating summations for shits and giggles. >> [_] Anon 3058690 I'm not going to sit here and pretend like this is relevant to me or that it invokes excitement to appear intelligent on an anonymous image board. Boring basic ass shit that has no application unless you are a career mathematician. >> [_] Anon 3058691 >># >boring >> [_] Anon 3058694 >># well you have been learning math for 10 years or so it sure must be for something, right? RIGHT? 10 YEARS OF MATH FOR SOMETHING, RIGHT? >> [_] Anon 3058707 literal autism >> [_] Anon 3058712 >># A biologist, a logician and a mathmatician are sitting on a bench across the street from a café. They see a person enter the café. A couple of minutes later they see two people leave the café. The biologist says: "They multiplied." The logician says: "There was someone already in the café." The mathmatician says: "There are now -1 people in the café." >> [_] Anon 3058714 >># No that's not true at all you can define the partial sum for .9... and see that the difference of 1 with this partial sum is stricly decreasing, then get the equality using convergence theorems. The partial sum of this other series just oscillates between two values and there is no such things as a convergence theorem for such a case. Math are made to be consistent and the reasoning in this video is just a random asspull, by extending this kind of result you can easily show dumb stuff like 0=1, that's why you don't just do whatever you want in mathematics... >> [_] Anon 3058717 >># pics or it didn't happen. post on a different board and link it here. >> [_] Anon 3058718 >># http://imgur.com/SP1buO2 >> [_] Anon 3058723 >># Well this is cool >> [_] Anon 3058724 >># well done anon >> [_] Anon 3058728 >># oh dang >> [_] Anon 3058733 >># oh fuck I though you meant just a blank brown paper I was wondering why would someone put a blank brown paper on their wall lol >> [_] Anon 3058734 >># see the part where he says "theres other ways to prove this" and he is stopped and the cameraman says "we have a video on that" >> [_] Anon 3058738 >># >># Thanks anons. I always wonder how much it would go for on an eBay auction now, but then my wall would be bare so I think I'm just gonna keep it. >> [_] Anon 3058740 >># delivered, lol >> [_] Anon 3058741 >># this math is false. he should not be shifting those numbers because it makes you be adding things you're subracting and vice versa. His logic is unsound because he is doing improper math. >> [_] Anon 3058742 >># It's not wrong, try it yourself. >> [_] Anon 3058743 >># >it makes you be adding things you're subracting kek >> [_] Anon 3058747 >># associative property of addition allows it same reason 2+4 is the same as 4+2 or 1-3 is the same as (-3)+1 >> [_] Anon 3058748 >># That's commutative, associative says (a+b)+c=a+(b+c). >> [_] Anon 3058776 >># Thing is that this result is very important in a lot of real life applications. Even engineering. >> [_] Anon 3058792 well this just came out if someone's interested in infinite amount of numbers https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SrU9YDoX E88 |
|