File[PhilosophyOfLiberty.swf] - (1.02 MB)
[_] [L] I love _you_ Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)14:23 No.1177063
I really do.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)14:28 No.1177067
all good, except the part about property
>> [_] Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)14:44 No.1177075
WHAT IS THIS GODDAMN ZEITGEIST BULLSHIT
>> [_] Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)15:01 No.1177091
haha. its funny because, if these are the basic laws of life liberty and property, we've seen the
United states violate these laws many times.
just when I thought I couldn't hate America any more than I do now.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)15:10 No.1177098
>>1177091
>Implying the US is the only government to have committed such violations in the history of the
world.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)15:10 No.1177099
Uh. It says in the flash that you can't take life, liberty, or property from others, but it
doesn't condone officials policing others either. So when someone else does this to you, you just
have to accept it, because officials shouldn't be able to do anything about it.
Nice philosophy.
>> [_] Friendsofsandwiches 02/07/10(Sun)15:18 No.1177104
Tyler Durden: You're not your job. You're not how much money you have in the bank. You're not the
car you drive. You're not the contents of your wallet. You're not your fucking khakis. You're the
all-singing, all-dancing crap of the world.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)15:34 No.1177122
>>1177098
I want to let you know that your point didn't just hit a wall of ignorance. I know that many
other countries and governments have done wrong and a lot of the times worse, but in my own life
time, there is only one country who invaded and killed thousands of innocent people based on a
lie, and that's the United states. Worst yet, they're proud of it, like they defeated evil.
You can argue with me all day, but its not going to change my opinion on the US. Just cause other
people have done it doesn't make it right.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)15:36 No.1177124
libertarians need to shut the fuck up about this shit and admit that without a government, you'd
just revert to feudalism. if there is absence of laws, the guy with the most power is going to
set his own laws in place.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)15:38 No.1177127
>>1177122
Im from England and we're responsible for the fucking Raj. I think we're worse.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)15:40 No.1177129
>>1177127
I'm from India and we're responsible for the fucking zero. I think we're worse.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)15:40 No.1177130
>>1177124
Assumes this flash is about libertarians and reverting the government to an anarchy instead of
ensuring government accountability.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)15:45 No.1177136
Well, this whole demonstartion is logical and okay from a purely theoric point of view, put it
fails because it assumes that everyone is nice and won't try to screw his next of kind.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)15:48 No.1177142
The flash is directly questioning the morality of inaction, when leaders who represent us invade
foreign lands. It stakes your is morally yours by right, it doesn't state you should roll over
and die when someone tries to take it.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)15:49 No.1177144
>>1177122
"You can argue with me all day, but its not going to change my opinion on the US"
Heloo, Mr. "Rooted comfortably in his political worldview,please dont debate me I am always
right".
>> [_] Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)15:55 No.1177153
>>1177130
even so, ensuring more gains for capitalist growth will allow more corporations to extend their
wealth and own your life instead of the government
>> [_] Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)15:56 No.1177154
>>1177153
Good point.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)15:56 No.1177155
>>1177099
You have the right to protect yourself.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)16:05 No.1177165
>>1177155
how? if you dont want to die, a collective of individuals are terrorising you, and there is no
greater organisation to protect you then it is completely futile.
its not the fucking wild west any more.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)16:30 No.1177182
>>1177165
Then maybe it should be.
>> [_] ages !!MxTEMuumWX4 02/07/10(Sun)16:41 No.1177186
I loved when he used the cannabis symbol along with a bunch of other high meaning symbols like
yin-yang.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)16:58 No.1177200
>>1177155
Not everyone can protect themselves.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)17:28 No.1177231
Not possible.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)17:29 No.1177232
John Locke agrees
>> [_] Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)17:31 No.1177233
DON'T POST THIS!
people wil stop comming to 4CHAN!!!! :-3
>> [_] Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)17:33 No.1177234
>>1177182
you do realise that with that turdspurt, you've officially lost this argument, right?
>> [_] Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)17:35 No.1177235
I find this flash movie informative and enlightening.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)17:35 No.1177236
>>1177200
That's where the 2nd amendment comes in. If you have a gun, you can protect yourself just fine.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)17:37 No.1177240
>>1177233
:'D
>> [_] Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)17:43 No.1177249
If some candidate give this speech and hold this to heart, he or she would go down in history as
some kind of savior.
To bad the most obvious things to say are the most hard to realize. Because imposing force is
part of human nature.
