File: physics.swf-(2.82 MB, 550x400, Game)
[_] Anonymous 06/22/21(Tue)14:54:32 No.3467715
23/37 I think I did well enough
Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anonymous 06/22/21(Tue)15:12:49 No.3467716
I'm a physics undergrad and I got 30/37. I large part of this quiz is about physics history more
than physics, and there are also a lot of questions about string theory, and I'm not well versed
on either of these subjects so I took several wild guesses, to be completely honest. I was only
confident in answering like half of the questions.
It would have been nice to see the solution to each question and a breakdown of your answers
afterwards, but oh well.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/22/21(Tue)15:19:30 No.3467717
23/37 and I just guessed the whole time. Physics is easy!
>> [_] Anonymous 06/22/21(Tue)15:23:53 No.3467719
>>3467717
The bane of multiple choice tests.
>> [_] The sleepy one. 06/22/21(Tue)15:30:00 No.3467720
>>3467717
Lol, you were lucky. I was also guessing and got just 17/37
>> [_] Anonymous 06/22/21(Tue)17:32:50 No.3467725
29/37, I'm a MS in CS. I agree with the other anon about this being a bit more on the history
than the physics itself. Would have also wanted to see which guesses were correct.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/22/21(Tue)17:49:16 No.3467727
> 29/37, I'm a MS in CS.
holy shit, same
>> [_] Anonymous 06/22/21(Tue)21:53:04 No.3467736
15 / 37
I am a layman that watches a science YouTube channel. I recognized some of the words and made
inferences thereof.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/22/21(Tue)22:13:33 No.3467737
>>3467736
Your score would have been better if you had only picked "true" or only picked "false" on all
questions without reading them.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/23/21(Wed)00:20:42 No.3467741
>>3467715
22/37
enginiggering student but i've studied physics (incl. quantum physics but it all flew over my
head) and some topics do genuinely interest me
would have gotten 2-3 more if i didn't skip through 5-6 of them (did it because of some retarded
reason)
>> [_] Anonymous 06/23/21(Wed)00:23:56 No.3467742
27/37, didn't know the answer to a single one
like high school all over again
>> [_] Anonymous 06/23/21(Wed)01:14:32 No.3467744
21/37
>> [_] John Moses Browning 06/23/21(Wed)08:56:55 No.3467753
>1. Brian Greeene likes String Theory
What the hell is that question? Which physics books, which formular, which dissertations do I
have to learn to answer this question??
>> [_] Anonymous 06/23/21(Wed)10:18:03 No.3467758
>>3467753
>Which physics books, which formular, which dissertations do I have to learn to answer this
question??
R. Easther, B. Greene, W. Kinney, G. Shiu, "Inflation as a Probe of Short Distance Physics".
Phys. Rev. D64 (2001) 103502.
Brian R. Greene, "D-Brane Topology Changing Transitions". Nucl. Phys. B525 (1998) 284-296.
Michael R. Douglas, Brian R. Greene, David R. Morrison, "Orbifold Resolution by D-Branes".
Nucl.Phys. B506 (1997) 84-106.
Brian R. Greene, David R. Morrison, Andrew Strominger, "Black Hole Condensation and the
Unification of String Vacua". Nucl.Phys. B451 (1995) 109-120.
P.S. Aspinwall, B.R. Greene, D.R. Morrison, "Calabi–Yau Moduli Space, Mirror Manifolds and
Spacetime Topology Change in String Theory". Nucl.Phys. B416 (1994) 414-480.
B.R.Greene and M.R.Plesser, "Duality in Calabi-Yau Moduli Space". Nucl. Phys. B338 (1990) 15
>> [_] John Moses Browning 06/23/21(Wed)11:09:39 No.3467761
>>3467758
Thanks
I guess "Brian Greene wrote books about String Theory" would have been better worded, oh well
>> [_] Anonymous 06/23/21(Wed)14:08:52 No.3467783
>>3467715
15/37
Am I retarded? I have no idea what I'm doing.
>> [_] anonymous 06/23/21(Wed)15:04:55 No.3467786
>>3467715
18/37
I watched the big bang theory
>> [_] John Moses Browning 06/23/21(Wed)16:28:47 No.3467792
Wow I also got 23 now
>> [_] Anonymous 06/24/21(Thu)01:17:54 No.3467817
>>3467715
18/37, i've never studied physics in any great detail outside of middle school.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/24/21(Thu)04:36:36 No.3467818
>>3467715
21/37 I think I mostly got the questions related to physics history wrong but everything else was
easy enough
>> [_] Anonymous 06/24/21(Thu)05:41:50 No.3467820
>>3467715
>20/37
didn't even read the questions just answered false to everything
>> [_] Anonymous 06/24/21(Thu)11:38:08 No.3467833
25/37, reminded me of when i got the highest scholarship among my friends despite being a retard
in math and physics and having studied the least.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/24/21(Thu)14:44:04 No.3467840
I know anything about physics and i have 16/37
>> [_] Anonymous 06/24/21(Thu)16:36:48 No.3467844
>>3467716
I tried to look a bit further into some of the questions and it is now obvious to me that this
quiz was made by a complete layman, which is ironic since the creator is mocking people on the
internet for pretending to be knowledgeable about physics.
Many of the questions have very iffy phrasing, making it difficult to just answer them with only
"true" and "false" as choices. This is in addition to the questionable decision to include
questions about physics history or questions about the opinion of people about theories in a
"quiz on modern physics". Like the other anon already said himself, the quiz starts off pretty
awful with the very first question.
This is on top of the problem that a series of multiple choice questions with two possible
answers (and one with four) is in general already a very poor way to make a quiz like this, since
the expected value for such a quiz is 50% of the points if someone were to just answer randomly.
And finally not revealing what answers were considered correct or incorrect in the end is just
another red flag.
So I went through the arduous task of checking questions by filling out the entire quiz multiple
times except flipping the answer on one question to check what would have been considered the
right answer by comparing the total points.
And, to no ones surprise, some of the questions are just plain incorrect.
What a waste of time.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/24/21(Thu)17:03:52 No.3467845
25/37, the last 4 I got tired of how many questions it was asking and just wanted to click
through and find out if a screamer was awaiting me
>> [_] Anonymous 06/24/21(Thu)21:23:19 No.3467855
>>3467715
I got 26, I barely know anything about physics or quantum physics, nor the history.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/24/21(Thu)22:16:41 No.3467858
30/37. I studied computer engineering, but took a cosmology course once that was incredibly
interesting (I read the textbook cover-to-cover) where I was introduced (at least superficially)
to relativity theory. I've also been doing some reading every now and then on the subject. Very
pleasant music, by the way.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/25/21(Fri)05:23:36 No.3467863
23/37 as well.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/25/21(Fri)09:07:41 No.3467867
29/37
534D5249DG139943DA0 (no idea what this code is)
I pretty much agree with everything in >>3467716, except that I've barely formally studied modern
physics at all and am a college dropout.
