STORY   LOOP   FURRY   PORN   GAMES
• C •   SERVICES [?] [R] RND   POPULAR
Archived flashes:
197676
/disc/ · /res/     /show/ · /fap/ · /gg/ · /swf/P0001 · P2150 · P4299

<div style="position:absolute;top:-99px;left:-99px;"><img src="http://swfchan.com:57475/62528327?noj=FRM62528327-13DN" width="1" height="1"></div>

This is the wiki page for Flash #203599
Visit the flash's index page for basic data and a list of seen names.


flashcarrier.swf
2,42 MiB, 00:00 | [W] [I]

Threads (17):

[NQR66GU]http://boards.4chan.org/f/thread/3356045/never-gonna-di…
ARCHIVEDDiscovered: 5/9 -2018 21:01:53 Ended: 6/9 -2018 09:11:46Flashes: 1 Posts: 7
File: flashcarrier.swf-(2.42 MB, 768x612, Other)
[_] Anon 3356045 Never gonna die Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anon 3356062 keep telling yourself that...
>> [_] Anon 3356075 >># >># I think we need fix it by adding bi/pansexual WASM who will fuck them both.
>> [_] Anon 3356077 >># why are you on /f/ if you're going to talk shit?
>> [_] Anon 3356090 this flash should die
>> [_] Anon 3356139 >># it's 4chan i'll talk shit all I want
>> [_] Anon 3356141 atleast you used a fucking awesome song, to make the gayest flash


[KG8MCZ9]http://boards.4chan.org/f/thread/3351105
ARCHIVEDDiscovered: 9/8 -2018 21:06:42 Ended: 9/8 -2018 21:06:42Flashes: 1 Posts: 1
File: flashcarrier.swf-(2.42 MB, 768x612, Loop)
[_] Anon 3351105


[KIH2X34]http://boards.4chan.org/f/thread/3343042
ARCHIVEDDiscovered: 25/6 -2018 03:43:00 Ended: 25/6 -2018 14:10:10Flashes: 1 Posts: 3
File: flashcarrier.swf-(2.42 MB, 768x612, Loop)
[_] Anon 3343042
>> [_] Anon 3343122 I understand the flashcarrier, but is the other one HTML5 ?
>> [_] Anon 3343123 >># yes


[HVJ4PCX]http://boards.4chan.org/f/thread/3337775
ARCHIVEDDiscovered: 25/5 -2018 08:40:44 Ended: 25/5 -2018 08:40:44Flashes: 1 Posts: 1
File: flashcarrier.swf-(2.42 MB, 768x612, Loop)
[_] Anon 3337775


[J5SPX9J]http://boards.4chan.org/f/thread/3323104
ARCHIVEDDiscovered: 17/3 -2018 03:06:21 Ended: 17/3 -2018 12:27:02Flashes: 1 Posts: 4
File: flashcarrier.swf-(2.42 MB, 768x612, Loop)
[_] Anon 3323104 Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anon 3323147 >># yeah fuck HTML 5
>> [_] Anon 3323173 >># desu javascript is a lot more coherent than as3. It's almost as if flash was only meant for smaller web animations. Plus the less things that adobe gets its grubby hands in the better. Web plugins were just something that existed to fill a need until we could standardize it.
>> [_] Anon 3323199 We're currently in the Anger stage, so we're progressing quite quickly. Hopefully we'll all have accepted Flash's death by 2020.


[J5QSMPL]! http://boards.4chan.org/f/thread/3321312
ARCHIVEDDiscovered: 9/3 -2018 10:17:01 Ended: 9/3 -2018 20:48:14Flashes: 1 Posts: 10
File: flashcarrier.swf-(2.42 MB, 768x612, Loop)
[_] Anon 3321312
>> [_] Sammy 3321352 >># >flash fucking HTML5 Call me a layman, but isn't it the other way round?
>> [_] Anon 3321368 >># Yes. The author probably still prefers .gifs and .bmp, as well.
>> [_] Anon 3321369 >># no it's not, layman >># those are irrelevant
>> [_] Anon 3321382 >># hi a layman, i'm nigger
>> [_] Anon 3321385 >># It is. The problem with that is that there are no flash-like HTML5 authoring tools for dumbfucks, so most of the low-tier flash creator community dies with flash. >video swf was never intended to be video container format. HTML5 video can do webm and literally anything else. >scripts Anything you can do in as3 you can do faster with modern js engines. >graphics There's no direct replacement for flash-like vector animations, but HTML5 canvas can do performant webgl (read: opengl) graphics unlike shitty software rendered flash.
>> [_] !Wulf.Eb.mY 3321398 >># >so most of the low-tier flash creator community dies with flash That's not even true, they export into MP4 which degrades the quality of the flash for increased file size and becoming "modern". >HTML5 video can do webm and literally anything else Except later rebuked with your own statement of: >There's no direct replacement for flash-like vector animations >HTML5 canvas can do performant webgl (read: opengl) graphics Except as stated earlier: >no flash-like HTML5 authoring tools No one will touch it because even Google won't create user-friendly tools for the shit they're shoveling. You're also missing these points: 1. SWF is an archived animation, so it's all transferred easily between peers in a single file and requires no effort to host. VS Canvas (the direct competitor to flash) is an html file with a separate folder containing any assets you used (songs, images, etc.) which is more tedious to share and host. 2. SWFs are sandboxed but still has a couple security risks. VS JS is not sandboxed and is now the most commonly used method to abuse users and with security risks up the ass.
>> [_] Anon 3321403 >># public opinion is that "html 5 is better" but nah, flash really fucks the shit out of html 5. but this is the future the powers that be have chosen.
>> [_] Anon 3321408 >># >That's not even true, they export into MP4 You can't export interactive content into video. Anyone producing "flash" content that befits a video format is dead to me. The visual style adobe/macromedia established with their vector animation stuff is distinct, but flash is nothing without interactivity. >Except later rebuked with your own statement of Don't take things out of context if you want to be taken seriously, tripfag. Vector animations have jack shit to do with video format capabilities. That said, SVG also offers some interesting possibilities for vector animations but browser support is still sketchy. I reckon any "flash replacement" would be a js library for canvas stuff - and gui editor to get the flash babbies back on the train. Counter-points: 1. It's possible to embed any kind of file into a single HTML file, with either base64 data uris or js blobs. Trivvial to do so programmatically, adding such a feature into any "flash replacement" software would be minimal work. And while this is not directly related to the "muh container" argument, many SWFs also load external content, so nothing new there. 2. What? Running JS inside your browser is far safer than shitty swf plugins ever were. Literally the entire internet runs on the same technology, it's uncountable orders of magnitude more mature than a niche platform like flash was. If there was will, the flash community could already have established promising projects for html5 flash-like authoring tools. Big flash portals could have already done the groundwork for hosting relatively freeform html5 replacements. But there is no will. Most flash creators are incompetents using whatever babbymode tool they can wrap their head around, so they're now jumping ship into unity (fucking lol) and flash portals are just encouraging that, if not encouraging exporting their shit animations to straight to video and forgoing any interactivity.
>> [_] Anon 3321420 Also. The way I see this, the impending death of flash will divide the userbases into two very distinct groups. 1. The majority of flash creators: The kids and amateurs who just want to make funny animations, garbage-tier porn games or whatever using with whichever simple tool is at hand. They will move onto unity webgl or videos or whatever the big flash portals push for. They might carry the "spirit" of flash style with them. At least the ease of creation / accessibility and subsequent shovelware quality will follow this group. 2. The minority of professionals (be it web designer, indie game programmer, js code monkey or whatever) with a side interest on the quirky little thing that is swf. They will continue to share cool HTML5+JS snippets on sites like jsdo.it and shadertoy. The macromedia/adobe style is dead to them. Neither is a proper replacement for flash. I'm worried about what will become of /f/ and swfchan once mainstream browsers finally drop swf plugin support.


[P1LGOC6]http://boards.4chan.org/f/thread/3315860
ARCHIVEDDiscovered: 16/2 -2018 03:51:37 Ended: 16/2 -2018 16:00:09Flashes: 1 Posts: 2
File: flashcarrier.swf-(2.42 MB, 768x612, Loop)
[_] Anon 3315860
>> [_] Anon 3315926 >># if only, anon if only


[UXVKDZW]! http://boards.4chan.org/f/thread/3311935/just-updated-f…
ARCHIVEDDiscovered: 30/1 -2018 04:21:43 Ended: 30/1 -2018 16:51:39Flashes: 1 Posts: 10
File: flashcarrier.swf-(2.42 MB, 768x612, Loop)
[_] Anon 3311935 Just updated Firefox to version 58.0.1 and now when I open a flash it just says "Run Adobe Flash" instead of the previous message that suggested that flash might be dangerous. This is a good thing! I didn't expect this from today's browsers that are hell-bent on tearing down flash for no reason other than because they have decided to do it. Could it be that they are listening to the pleads of people that love flash?? Unfortunately I can't remember exactly what the old message said, if you haven't upgraded Firefox yet please post the old message here. Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anon 3311938 >This plugin has security vulnerabilities. >Activate Adobe Flash. Hm, was this it? Or is this what it said when you were using an old version of flash?
>> [_] Anon 3311939 >This site uses a plugin that may slow Firefox. >Activate Adobe Flash. This is the one! It's not as bad as >># but a simple "Run Adobe Flash" is a million times better.
>> [_] Anon 3311952 >># >># >># cool but it's only changing phrases for the same block function nothing changed and will change and people will try to demonize flash until it's demise personally I was most upset about "This site uses a plugin that may slow Firefox." I picture dumb people opening a cancerous ad site and then going DERP Y DA COMPUTAH SO SLOOW fuck, when I open a single swf file fullscreen I know damn well how fast my pc will be (as fast as before actually) that's the biggest concern people have? that it MIGHT slow down their toaster pc browser by opening 100 tabs with cpu intense swf files? not the security vulnerability or unability to know which swf files a random site runs automatically... FLASH MAKE DA COMPUTAH GO SLOWER, OH NOEZ fuck humanity
>> [_] Anon 3311959 >># >personally I was most upset about "This site uses a plugin that may slow Firefox." That's why I'm happy it only says "Run Adobe Flash" now. I don't really have a problem with flash no longer auto-loading in browsers, as long as it is possible to activate it with a simple click or two. Removing any kind of scary, and frankly, bullshit message like it will "slow down your browser" is good. A video will also slow down your browser. As will many images. Or a HTML5 game. Or JavaScript. All of those will still auto-load just fine in Firefox without any scary messages. I'm still hopeful flash plugin will remain even after 2020. Not optimistic, just hoping for it.
>> [_] Anon 3311965 Hope you are ready for 2020 Win7 end of life and flash is dead
>> [_] Anon 3311968 >># adobe should opensource that shit so flash can live on
>> [_] Anon 3311970 >># and here i am on windows 7, enjoying flash. damn it all.
>> [_] Anon 3312016 >># wait thats a great idea
>> [_] Anon 3312056
>> 3312055


[K9ONK8B]!! http://boards.4chan.org/f/thread/3308436
ARCHIVEDDiscovered: 15/1 -2018 20:49:40 Ended: 16/1 -2018 05:34:22Flashes: 1 Posts: 39
File: flashcarrier.swf-(2.42 MB, 768x612, Loop)
[_] Anon 3308436 Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anon 3308439 you know it's the other way around. or will be in 2 years anyway
>> [_] Anon 3308443 >># only if html 5 could emulate flash otherwise it's gonna be like this forever
>> [_] Anon 3308450 >># except no browser will support it anymore and you'll be raped by russianrabies
>> [_] Anon 3308463 >># except that browsers will need to continue support for shit to keep working because people arent going to stop using flash when it stops being supported >wut iz windows xp
>> [_] Anon 3308467 What's their baby going to be? Htmlwave 5? Flashtml?
>> [_] Anon 3308469 >># a bastard child that nobody wants
>> [_] Anon 3308473 >># the browser vendors couldn't be happier over the removal of flash. it's a piece of bloated proprietary shit that's both inefficient and deemed a security hazard. now that adobe themselves are stopping support for it, there's no way that browsers are going to continue instead. there'll still be external legacy players that can run flash but any developer who hasn't been living under a rock would stay away from it.
>> [_] Anon 3308477 >># >it's a piece of bloated proprietary shit that's both inefficient and deemed a security hazard. The funny thing is that there isn't anything open source that does what flash (the player and creation software) does to the same quality. The supposed html5 replacement is also a security hazard, with cryptocoin miners, browser alert boxes and various malicious scripts to the point that many people use a browser extension to block javascript from running by default; similar to how most browsers blocked flash for their users in the past few years.
>> [_] Anon 3308482 >># >zomg I clicked on a flash and it wants to print something I don't want to !!1 no amount of security will save your dumb ass if you really want to be safe just cut the ethernet cable right now
>> [_] Anon 3308484 >># >there isn't anything open source that does what flash (the player and creation software) does to the same quality yes there is? in most use cases, html5 can do the same exact thing as flash does while using less resources to do it. as for the creation software, nobody gives a fuck about its importance besides the faggots who also suck steve jobs's necrophiliac cock daily. >security hazard none of what you mentioned actually is a security risk. yeah they're as malicious as what flash is capable of but any private info being compromised is usually the fault of the programmer rather than the software itself, unlike flash which has vulnerabilities being discovered nearly daily.
>> [_] Anon 3308486 >># >it's a piece of bloated proprietary shit that's both inefficient and deemed a security hazard ahahahaha this nigga tryin to talk shit like this about flash when javascript exists and is only getting worse
>> [_] Anon 3308487 >># https://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerability -list/vendor_id-53/product_id-6761/Adobe- Flash-Player.html you're one of those morons that has been living under a rock this whole time. there's a reason no one uses flash for anything of high-critical importance.
>> [_] Anon 3308488 >># >open-source >getting worse you've never heard of github have you? proof that you're just a dumb retard that has no further knowledge than a layman
>> [_] Anon 3308497 >># gib examples also the creation software is important because because without a good html5 creation software, less people will make html5 stuff. in addition there isn't an html5 standard similar to flash where everything is in a single file oh and if those don't count as security risks for whatever reason, then give your definition of a security risk
>> [_] Anon 3308499 >># webm is one example that's even being used by 4chan right now. better encoding, less bloat. there's plenty of game creation software like unity or godot that can export to html easily, or rpgmaker that can use js natively to export to other platforms. flash having a good creation tool is merely an overstatement.
>> [_] Anon 3308502 >># as for security risks, read the post above. if you want even more, just google it. flash has too many exploits to count that are constantly being found and patched over.
>> [_] Anon 3308506 >># >there isn't an html5 standard similar to flash where everything is in a single file there are tools that can do this. look at rollup or webpack which bundle all your code automatically.
>> [_] Anon 3308510 >># >># >Total number of vulnerabilities : 1044 That's quite a misleading statement. I looked through many of them and the vulnerabilities are usually stated as "for adobe flash player version x.x.x.x.x or lower" and start at some version of adobe flash player 9. The most recent version is flash player 27 and that site only lists 7 vulnerabilities for that version.
>> [_] Anon 3308511 >># >security risks no I asked for YOUR definition, since what I consider a security risk isn't good enough for you
>> [_] Anon 3308512 >># MY definition is the LITERAL definition and it's NOT your DUMBFUCK HEADCANON, okay? >># >still trying to defend flash's biggest weakness why do you even still bother to justify yourself?
>> [_] Anon 3308518 >># >LITERAL definition https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Risk#Secur ity >A security risk is any event that could result in the compromise of organizational assets i.e. the unauthorized use, loss, damage, disclosure or modification of organizational assets for the profit, personal interest or political interests of individuals, groups or other entities constitutes a compromise of the asset, and includes the risk of harm to people. >unauthorized use so how is cryptocoin mining not a security risk via your own definition? >why do you even still bother to justify yourself? because 7 vulnerabilities that will be patched don't seem like a big deal.
>> [_] Anon 3308525 >># >browser alert boxes and how are browser alert boxes a security hazard to you? cryptocoin mining is at least borderline in the same sense that any game that uses resources and logs the data within the process could be considered "cryptocoin mining" if that data were just as valuable. also you should reread that definition in the full context of "unauthorized use [that could result in the compromise of organizational assets]". just as i thought, you and your DUMBFUCK HEADCANON. >7 vulnerabilities they're only vulnerabilities that were discovered. there could be far more that aren't exposed to the public. don't kid yourself, the list will only continue to grow while adobe themselves is literally not going to touch it anymore.
>> [_] Anon 3308531 >># >and how are browser alert boxes a security hazard to you? The javascript alert function forces the browser to switch to the tab that generated the box and won't let the user interact with the browser until the box is closed. An attack that I've seen, before installing noscript, is to open an alert box as soon as the previous one is closed which forces a user to close the window which that tab is open in. >you and your DUMBFUCK HEADCANON. I just used the definition of security risk that wikipedia quoted. Why have you not stated your definition by now? Please do. >they're only vulnerabilities that were discovered. there could be far more that aren't exposed to the public. The same goes for any application. There's malicious exploits in javascript web frameworks, not to mention cross site scripting. The W3C statement on javascript security says enough for me to not trust most sites: "We cannot stress this enough. JavaScript is a wonderful language and can help you to build highly responsive and beautifully interactive web sites and applications, but where it falls down terribly is security. In short, there is no security model in JavaScript and you should not protect, encrypt, secure or store anything vital or secret with it" (https://www.iad.gov/iad/customcf/openAt tachment.cfm?FilePath=/iad/library/report s/assets/public/upload/JavaScript-Securit y-Risks.pdf&WpKes=aF6woL7fQp3dJiegGJ5E5te Tgrb3CdeJCMGnLB) >don't kid yourself, the list will only continue to grow while adobe themselves is literally not going to touch it anymore. That may be true after 2020, but adobe is still going to release security updates until that time.
>> [_] Anon 3308534 >># reread the definition. now read your example of it. checkmate. it's not even up for argument at this point and doing so at this point just makes you a clown. also i can see you're just parroting general terms since you used the term cross site scripting without knowing the full meaning behind it. it's not the fault of javascript itself, it's the usage of malicious third party libraries that have access to the same domain as you since you're using them. there's a HUGE difference in security risks due between the programmer's incompetence and the language itself, ie flash. you're just a moronic layman that likes to hear himself argue. open your eyes, flash is shit and everyone acknowledges it except for retards like you.
>> [_] !Wulf.Eb.mY 3308535 >># Don't waste your time. He's baiting and not even trying to come up with an argument. He's wrong and is probably acutely aware of it and just playing it up further because it's fun to act like a retard.
>> [_] Anon 3308536 >># just like how retards samefag while thinking it gives themselves credibility. i don't believe that there could be multiple people that share the same thought process as a retard. and if you are really just as retarded as the previous guy well, it's not my problem.
>> [_] Anon 3308537 >># >reread the definition. now read your example of it. checkmate. hold it! where is your definition of a security risk? I'm still waiting on that since arguing whether something is or isn't a security risk is pointless if we don't agree on what a security risk is.
>> [_] Anon 3308539 >># https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Risk#Secur ity >A security risk is any event that could result in the compromise of organizational assets i.e. the unauthorized use, loss, damage, disclosure or modification of organizational assets for the profit, personal interest or political interests of individuals, groups or other entities constitutes a compromise of the asset, and includes the risk of harm to people. >A security risk is any event that could result in the compromise of organizational assets neither a browser alert nor cryptocoin mining result in the compromise of organizational assets. i win, you lose.
>> [_] !Wulf.Eb.mY 3308544 >># Computational load is considered an asset. If you're accessing something that forcibly increases computational load on any of your hardware with malicious or intent unknown to the user, then it is a security risk that damages your assets. If computational load wasn't an asset then the measuring the value of different cpu/gpu architectures would be impossible, therefore selling them would never attain profit, yatta yatta blah blah blah semantics make the world go round and someone here doesn't study business or computer science and it isn't me or >>#.
>> [_] Anon 3308545 >># Oh so you accept that definition whereas in >># you called it my "DUMBFUCK HEADCANNON"? Nice backpedaling. And to extrapolate on that point, if someone can force people to use cpus for cryptocoin mining, which is a heavy computational load, it stands to reason that there's potential for javascripts which overheat and damage the cpu,
>> [_] Anon 3308547 Both browsers and flash player are insecure as fuck. Running random code sent to you from strangers is a security nightmare.
>> [_] Anon 3308550 >># >Running random code sent to you from strangers sounds hot, any source on that?
>> [_] Anon 3308551 >># Especially when the code can execute from pdf files, which most people think should be as secure as a text file. You can even do an SQL injection from your browser's useragent if the website you're visiting is insecure enough.
>> [_] Anon 3308552 >># At least borderline? I don't want ANY program using a single byte of resources on my machine unless I say so. That's just like saying people who use your comp as a torrent repeater is borderline. Have fun with latency and less resources. Yeah that's just borderline LOL.
>> [_] Anon 3308553 >># What do you mean? Any time run javascript or actionscript that's someone else's code.
>> [_] Anon 3308555 >># I think he means code that is ran on your PC - without you even doing anything or allowing it. Is it cool if I install and run programs on your PC without your consent? If so cool I'll send a few .exe's your way - I need to increase my botnet.
>> [_] Anon 3308580 >># I'm mainly concerned about loops. WebM has to have everything line up perfectly in order to loop properly, Flash doesn't. Can HTML5 emulate that? Genuine question, not trying to put you down by the way.
>> [_] Anon 3308582 >># >Can HTML5 emulate that? I'm not that guy, but it absolutely can. https://mozilla.github.io/shumway/ Here's an example of some simple HTML5 flash loops. This pages literally runs .swfs in javascript. Unfortunately the project was abandoned. The problem with html5 is with tooling. There are no good animation tools for creating original html5 animations afaik. And if you were an animator WHY would you want to export to javascript when you can render a video? And even if you did create something, how would you distribute it? An .html page? There's really no good way to share "javascript animations" (ew)


[RKBRK4D]http://boards.4chan.org/f/thread/3300141
ARCHIVEDDiscovered: 9/12 -2017 19:16:49 Ended: 9/12 -2017 20:46:15Flashes: 1 Posts: 2
File: flashcarrier.swf-(2.42 MB, 768x612, Loop)
[_] Anon 3300141
>> [_] Anon 3300162 I want to be fucked by a hot ginger bara


[EKVVXTB]http://boards.4chan.org/f/thread/3293724
ARCHIVEDDiscovered: 11/11 -2017 16:51:34 Ended: 12/11 -2017 07:12:06Flashes: 1 Posts: 3
File: flashcarrier.swf-(2.42 MB, 768x612, Loop)
[_] Anon 3293724 Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anon 3293874 song is nice, sauce
>> [_] Anon 3293889 >># Hubnester Rising, Machinae Supremacy


[UJLU068]http://boards.4chan.org/f/thread/3286912
ARCHIVEDDiscovered: 12/10 -2017 20:21:30 Ended: 12/10 -2017 20:39:44Flashes: 1 Posts: 2
File: flashcarrier.swf-(2.42 MB, 768x612, Loop)
[_] Anon 3286912
>> [_] Anon 3286916 >># Flash will never die!


[J5SIJC4]http://boards.4chan.org/f/thread/3283092
ARCHIVEDDiscovered: 27/9 -2017 16:09:00 Ended: 28/9 -2017 03:49:52Flashes: 1 Posts: 2
File: flashcarrier.swf-(2.42 MB, 768x612, Loop)
[_] Anon 3283092 Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anon 3283242 song source?


[T3Q5BAY]http://boards.4chan.org/f/thread/3280270
ARCHIVEDDiscovered: 14/9 -2017 18:01:29 Ended: 15/9 -2017 06:45:23Flashes: 1 Posts: 1
File: flashcarrier.swf-(2.42 MB, 768x612, Loop)
[_] Anon 3280270


[Y7O6P2A]http://boards.4chan.org/f/thread/3279141
ARCHIVEDDiscovered: 9/9 -2017 14:40:59 Ended: 9/9 -2017 14:40:59Flashes: 1 Posts: 1
File: flashcarrier.swf-(2.42 MB, 768x612, Loop)
[_] Anon 3279141


[NKB4Z5A]http://boards.4chan.org/f/thread/3277968
ARCHIVEDDiscovered: 4/9 -2017 08:35:44 Ended: 4/9 -2017 21:49:31Flashes: 1 Posts: 5
File: flashcarrier.swf-(2.42 MB, 768x612, Loop)
[_] Anon 3277968
>> [_] Anon 3277970 flash assraping html good
>> [_] Anon 3278032 hot :F
>> [_] Anon 3278046 until 2020 and flash gets killed off what if /f/ dies?
>> [_] Anon 3278072 >># /f/ only die if we leave


[GZWD6DC]F http://boards.4chan.org/f/thread/3277428
ARCHIVEDDiscovered: 2/9 -2017 10:40:09 Ended: 3/9 -2017 00:54:56Flashes: 1 Posts: 9
File: flashcarrier.swf-(2.42 MB, 768x612, Loop)
[_] Anon 3277428 Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anon 3277444 This pleases me. Wave that flag.
>> [_] Anon 3277500 Hold on, is this Machinae Supremacy?
>> [_] Anon 3277502 >># Flag Carrier
>> [_] Anon 3277506 i didnt know /f/ was this hot for html5
>> [_] Anon 3277515 mods need to change /f/ - Flash to /f/ - HTML5
>> [_] Anon 3277541 >># >># kys
>> [_] Anon 3277547 If Flash is so great why is /f/ getting deleted?
>> [_] Anon 3277548 >># >># Hubnester Rising



http://swfchan.net/41/203599.shtml
Created: 2/9 -2017 10:45:24 Last modified: 11/10 -2018 01:37:19 Server time: 13/11 -2018 23:45:57